User talk:Fumitol/Archive/2011

in my view, you are doing vandalism
your recent edit appears to be in defence of a bot running amok, and obviously you did not take any look at what all you were reverting. I regard your action as vandalism. diffs: ,, You did not voice your view in the article's talkpage, instead you removed a lot of valuable material. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 17:52, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Writing this: "but in this wikipedia there's an idiot bot running amok (its rssponsible, some admin, announces that he is only rarely in Wikipedia and does not respond swiftly) which blindly removes the link to Alifrosti material and to everything else too. " Is vandalism. Change it so that it doesnt include that part please. Thank you.  Fumitol &#124; talk &#124; cont  17:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

So, you are now confessing that you made an excessive removal of material, and not only the "offensive" part. Your action was vandalism as itself. Be warned about your vandalism. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 18:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank You for pointing that out. Please, dont add quips like you did again to material. Fumitol &#124; talk &#124; cont  18:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

In my opinion, malfunctioning automatic bots can be freely criticized. They do not enjoy the protection of no personal attacks, because they are not persons. And because you started to function like a blind automaton, criticism against your actions is also fully acceptable. It seems you do not read first what you are removing. 82.181.234.211(talk) 18:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You have opined enough to me about my mistake, which is what it was. People make mistakes. I have admitted fault. Please, discontinue posting on my talk page. From here on out, they will be considered personal attacks. Fumitol &#124; talk &#124; cont  18:15, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't believe that you have made a mistake, Fumitol, and certainly not one that would merit this wikilawyering badgering. Angelfire is a host where anyone can print anything...it does not constitute being a reliable source. Disregard the IPs efforts to label your actions vandalism...he doesn't know the meaning of the word as it pertains to WP. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—►  ((⊕)) 18:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Update: This is User:Marrtel socking with such incivility when he should know better. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—►  ((⊕)) 19:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank You for the update. I had figured that this was a sockpuppet. Your ability to find the truth is fantastic, and I thank you for your service to the WP Community overall. Fumitol &#124; talk &#124; cont  19:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Apple Inc Spoken Article
Hi, just wondering if you are still working on the Spoken Article version of Apple Inc.. If not, I will be removing the article from the list in 7 days. Thanks! Cognate247 (talk) 03:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback at wikiproject Nortel
Ottawahitech (talk) 14:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

"Teabagger" vandalism
If one more user pops up doing this, don't bother with 4 warnings, report it to me and I'll block. – Connormah (talk) 18:54, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Will do. Currently monitoring Fat&Happy. I was about to put a message on your wall about those two users. Fumitol &#124; talk &#124; cont  18:57, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Righty, thanks. Should probably stop soon, most likely a 4chan or some other online community attack... – Connormah (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Someone beat me to the punch, though. – Connormah (talk) 19:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank You. I will still continue to monitor Fat&Happy. Fumitol &#124; talk &#124; cont 19:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It was semi-protected. May be worth monitoring the other pages that this vandal has hit, though. – Connormah (talk) 19:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * I'm flattered! Thank You!! Fumitol &#124; talk &#124; cont 19:00, 5 November 2011 (UTC)