User talk:FunFindsCitations

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Kentucky Broodmare of the Year
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kentucky Broodmare of the Year, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.tbheritage.com/HistoricDams/AmBroodmareofYear.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glenelg (horse)


A tag has been placed on Glenelg (horse) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shadowjams (talk) 02:26, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Glenelg (horse)
Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Glenelg (horse). Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:16, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Referencing
Many of the articles you are creating on individual horses lack references altogether, or rely on one single directory references. Since the horses have notable accomplishments, and the various horse -related sporting events are very widely reported, it should be easily possible for you to do this initially. If you're the expert, don't leave it for others.  DGG ( talk ) 05:17, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Quick mini-survey about your editing experience
Hi FunFindsCitations,

You are one of a number of users who recently received a message from SDPatrolBot. I'm curious to hear about your experience with the speedy deletion process and how you feel about the message you received. Specifically, I'd like to know...
 * 1) Was the message clearly written?
 * 2) Was it helpful in communicating what you should do to save your article from getting deleted?
 * 3) Are there any changes you'd like to see made to such messages in the future that you think might make them more effective for new users?
 * 4) Any other observations you'd like to make about contesting a speedy deletion? How did you find the process overall?

If you'd prefer not to answer in a public space, you can feel free to email me your response (mpinchuk@undefinedwikimedia.org), and I'll be sure to keep it private unless you indicate otherwise. Your observations and suggestions are really valuable for helping improve the new editor experience on Wikipedia, so any feedback you can give would be appreciated immensely! Thank you, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Chester House
Hello FFC. I see you have been doing some good work on creating articles on racehorses. You could sign up as a member of WikiProject Thoroughbred racing, you would be most welcome. As I pointed out on the Chester House talkpage, your writing style is a bit too "colourful": try to be as neutral as possible. If you want to introduce opinions and descriptions it is best to use quotations from sources. So far I have managed to get three articles up to Good Article standard, you might want to take a look at Fantastic Light, Duke of Marmalade and Ladas. Regards.  Tigerboy1966  22:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

misleading edit summary in "Killer whale attacks on humans" article
I noticed you made to the Killer whale attacks on humans article earlier this year. Your edit summary makes no sense in regards to the change you made. First, the removal of the link was properly justified by the editor who removed it because there was a link to the Blackfish documentary (at the time these edits were made) previously in the article. Generally we do not repeat links in the "See also" section when that happens (see MOS:SEEALSO). It's a soft rule that can be broken but it's worth adding a justification when it is. You additionally said "Info unnecessary for list and the change was erroneous". But you added the entry so presumably you meant "necessary for list" and the phrase "change was erroneous" makes no sense here. Please be careful to word your edit summaries properly and to double check with policy before saying other editor's actions are "erroneous". It this case, it was your edit that was against standard practice while there's was in-line with it. Jason Quinn (talk) 17:45, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Please take care to consult the talk section on the page in question before bring your concerns to a user's attention, as this issue has already been addressed. KConWiki had brought the mistake (I had intended to undo a different edit) to my attention with in the same week. Your concern is admirable though. FunFindsCitations (talk) 12:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Oops, I didn't do that. My fault. I follow that page closely and thought I was already aware of all the discussions there but that one past me without notice. I moved your reply here to not fragment the thread. I have an edit notice about that on my talk page so touché! Tongue.png Jason Quinn (talk) 14:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited What a Pleasure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nasrullah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canadian Champion Three-Year-Old Male Horse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heart to Heart ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Canadian_Champion_Three-Year-Old_Male_Horse check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Canadian_Champion_Three-Year-Old_Male_Horse?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John B. Connally Turf Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Lynch. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)