User talk:FungiKwaku

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kekal2004germany.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kekal2004germany.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Kekal album ratings removal
Hi, just wanted to thank you for removing the ratings on the Kekal album pages. I wasn't sure if they were professional, but I figured if they were not someone would remove them. Thanks, --3family6 00:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Kekal work
Nice job on helping clean up my mess on the Kekal article.--3family6 (talk) 02:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Maintaining Kekal
Hello, as you have been very active on Kekal's article, I have included you on the list of users who maintain the page. If you do not wish to be listed, please remove your name from the list.--3family6 (talk) 02:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Kekal is a good article
Kekal is now listed as a good article. Thank you for your help in getting it up to that status.--3family6 (talk) 20:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)