User talk:Funkquake

February 2017
Hello, I'm Bertdrunk. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Gettysburg, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bertdrunk (talk) 13:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Overlinking
Hi, Funkquake. You've added a number of bluelinks to some very commonplace terms. We don't generally link common or everyday terms when their comprehension requires only a basic knowledge of English. I'm very sure you're doing so in good faith; but it doesn't really help readers. Please see WP:OVERLINK and WP:BLUELINK. Thanks, Haploidavey (talk) 19:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Battle of Peleliu into Trench warfare. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your Sanhedrin Trial Edits included text lifted straight from the Babylonian Talmud
Your edits to Sanhedrin trial of Jesus were extremely unconstructive and many even bigoted against Christians. You inserted near pure Talmudic verses concerning the Trial of Jesus into the text when it is clear the Text is discussing ONLY the Gospels position on the trial. I know these verses and I know what you tried to do. I am officially warning you not to do that again. It is bigoted to try to insert such false erranious information into the section which CLEARLY describes THE GOSPELS VERSION of the trial NOT THE TALMUD'S VERSION. Colliric (talk) 13:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Okay, first off I wasn't even thinking about the Talmud inscriptions, I was reading about the article in Pontious Pilate's court article on Wikipedia, and was I have never read the Babylonian Talmud version, I have read earlier Christian versions of the Bible, instead of the KJV, such as the Tyndale Bible, and please, stop judging me of something I had never thought of from another scripture from another culture.--Funkquake (talk) 00:27, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Carl Tanzler into Incidents of necrophilia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Bob Lazar
Hi! There is a discussion about your recent Bob Lazar edits over at Talk:Bob Lazar. I'm hoping that you will participate in the discussion, in particular, I'm interested to know if you found any WP:RS that support the idea that Lazar is/was a whistleblower or involved in Remote Viewing. Cxbrx (talk) 06:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)