User talk:Funky on Flames

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.--Otterathome (talk) 11:37, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gay Luigi
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Gay Luigi, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WWGB (talk) 15:10, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo is the more common one, but
You have a point. In fact, your revision actually takes a little shorter to speak out loud, given one less comma will be necessary. I guess that you can't shake off old time consuming habits.
 * Buffalo buffalo that Buffalo buffalo buffalo, buffalo Buffalo buffalo is one correct phrase.
 * Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo that Buffalo buffalo buffalo also works.
 * How much do you want to bet a bot is going to be incorrectly triggered because of how many times I was required to say buffalo? mechamind  9  0  23:35, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

"L is real 2041" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect L is real 2041. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 30 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  O.N.R.  (talk) 03:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)