User talk:Funny-fortnight gang enforcer

August 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to SANS Institute—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Vwgsgsjospenuxbskabdhzjanmzhaiqhagzgs diabsjsgsvzjsvak sjsb ndhi hskao j ia ahah disjsjsbsjshsu. Funny-fortnight gang enforcer (talk) 14:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at SANS Institute. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - MegaGoatContribs 14:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at SANS Institute, you may be blocked from editing. - MegaGoatContribs 14:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to SANS Institute. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

No U Funny-fortnight gang enforcer (talk) 15:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

We have policies here, sir. Take them as a joke and you will be blocked from wikipedia shortly. - MegaGoatContribs 15:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - MegaGoatContribs 15:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

U tHink ThAt WiLl StoP Me Funny-fortnight gang enforcer (talk) 15:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Glen (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Glen (talk) 15:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)