User talk:Fustin Jields

Moving pages?
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Fan Controlled Football, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Why do you keep moving that page? Is there something I can help you with? Yosemiter (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

I was moving the page to create a redirect. JumperZ69666420 (talk) 20:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That is not a valid reason to move a page and it can create broken links or break edit histories for attribution purposes if the articles are split out. Please read how to make a redirect for next time (or use How to make a redirect). Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 20:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edit to Talk:Andrew Siciliano, please remember that talk pages are for discussion related to improving the corresponding article, not general discussion about its topic. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 03:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SamCordes. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mo Lewis, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SamCordes talk 05:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Ed Donatell has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 02:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

My edits are usually constructive, and this one was. I just decided to make the summary a shitpost lol.

Don't.
Please do not write disruptive edit summaries ("shitposts"). Doing so may well be considered as disruptive editing if not vandalism, and may result in a block from editing. Thanks.  Java Hurricane  03:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Geometry Dash
You removed my edit, but your right it’s too informal and unsourced lol, based on your username having Jumper in its name, and being on the GD wiki page I assume your a follow GDer! :) WikiMakersOfOurTime (talk) 17:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I am lol, my Geometry Dash username is JumperOverrated. JumperZ69666420 (talk) 20:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Eagles 24/7 (C)  22:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This block is being applied since you continued to add disruptive edit summaries despite multiple warnings to stop. Eagles 24/7 (C)  22:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The block has expired, but your edit summary at Silverback (disambiguation) (written six days after your second warning about edit summaries) was disruptive and I deleted it from public view. Eagles 24/7 (C)  19:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Eagles <b style="color:#004C54">24/7</b> (C)  22:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I've shortened the block by five days to a total of two days. Looking at the edit history at No pitch, it appears another long-time editor has been engaging in an edit war regarding this specific addition of a joke in mainspace, and JumperZ69666420 was only reinstating it. I am keeping the block at two days, however, for the intentionally deceptive edit summary used after multiple warnings and a block about the proper use of edit summaries. Leaving the unblock request open in case another administrator believes the newly shortened block is still unwarranted. <b style="color:#004C54">Eagles</b> <b style="color:#004C54">24/7</b> (C)  04:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

I didn't know about the edit war. I knew that the joke was there and it was removed, but I had no idea about the edit war. I think that this ban is fine and fair, honestly. If another administrator disagrees with this ban still, I don't really care if it is removed or not. JumperZ69666420 (talk) 04:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Isaiah Wilson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. <b style="color:#004C54">Eagles</b> <b style="color:#004C54">24/7</b> (C)  19:52, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Frank Gore, you may be blocked from editing. <b style="color:#004C54">Eagles</b> <b style="color:#004C54">24/7</b> (C)  22:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)