User talk:Futasoku

Welcome!
Hello, Futasoku, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Hyacinth (talk) 01:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Joseph Conrad
Please use the talk page rather than making "dummy edits" just to explain yourself in the edit summary.  Volunteer Marek  06:29, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Please see WP:3RR. You're basically failing to convince anyone on the talk page that your change is warranted. You are also in violation of the 3 revert rule (quite a bit so if we count the edit made with the IP address).  Volunteer Marek  05:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

This is the last warning I'm going to bother with, and even this one is only because I assume you're a new user: You have violated the three revert restriction, in fact, have gone way over it. You have been edit warring on the Joseph Conrad page for several days now, acting clearly against consensus. No matter how "right" you think you are the fact is that pretty much nobody, Polish or not, agrees with your changes on the talk page of the article. You have also not even bothered trying to convince others of your arguments, nor sought any kind of compromise, but instead have been repeating the same irrelevant statement over and over again. This is a textbook example of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, which, in addition to WP:3RR I pointed out above, you should also read.

I would very much appreciate it if you self-reverted your last revert and refrained from making that change until, and if, consensus on the talk page sways your way.  Volunteer Marek  05:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Xanthoxyl &lt; 05:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit-warring on Joseph Conrad
I am not going to block you for edit-warring on the article. You breached WP:3RR on October 25, but you weren't really warned of the policy until October 26. However, it is clear, regardless of any technical violation of 3RR, that you have been edit-warring against multiple editors. Even taking into account that you are a newly registered account, your conduct has been substandard. You have accused editors of bias. You have accused editors of sock puppetry. You are fortunate to be getting out of this without a block.

As for the future, don't make any changes to the Conrad article without achieving a clear consensus on the talk page for your change. Don't make personal attacks against other editors. Don't accuse other editors of sock puppetry. If any of these things occur, you may be blocked.

You are, of course, welcome to continue discussing the issues on the article talk page (civilly). There are also dispute resolution mechanisms available to you.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)