User talk:FutueYou

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Perry Como. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. We hope (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. We hope (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

HOW DO I SEND A MESSAGE? I cannot find any way to reply. Is this edit a reply? And why are my edits considered vandalism? I am referencing contemporary newspaper articles! This is not vandalism, this is merely showing other sides of Como than a hagiography. If this is how wikipedia works, then it is indeed very, very broken. Please let me know you read this message.


 * Hello FutueYou. You edited a user page, which is how an editor is allowed to present himself to the community.  You send messages on an editors talk page.  You can send a message to someone almost always by clicking on the characters by someone's signature.  In We hope's case, it is clearly marked as "talk".  Regarding your edits, I can perfectly see why he reverted your "hitting" addition.  Even most people against corporate punishment understand the difference between spanking (what Como was referring to) and hitting, and the way you stated it was not only put subjectively instead of encyclopedicly ("oddly those values"), but the way you phrased it you make it seem like Como encouraged general assault against random minors, which is clearly not what the source states.  Your second edit adding the nicknames I think could be open for discussion.  In this case, you added something, and then it was reverted.  The proper course here is to take your proposed addition to the Perry Como talk page here.  Note that this has been promoted to a good article, which means that aside from needing high verifiability, anything which seems to interrupt the general flow of the article will probably not reach consensus to be included.  I hope that helps.    78.26   (His Wiki's Voice) 01:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * P.S. Also, please don't use misleading edit summaries like "changed verb tense" when clearly that is not what you did, as in this edit. That is something a vandal would do, not someone looking to improve the encyclopedic content of Wikipedia.    78.26   (His Wiki's Voice) 02:01, 26 June 2014 (UTC)