User talk:Futurearchitect91

July 2017
Hello, I'm A Great Catholic Person. I noticed that you recently removed content from Publix without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. A Great Catholic Person (talk) 00:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Your recent editing history at Mid-Atlantic states shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

This is a content dispute, not vandalism. Please refrain from reverting edits without first discussing it on the article's talk page. Dlthewave (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Futurearchitect91. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 19:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Why do you get to make the final call. I don't see why Virginia is taken away from the Mid-Atlantic region when you're not part of any census team nor know anything about the regions of the east coast. VA was part of the Mid-Atlantic until recently... what would have changed to make you feel and only you remove VA when Maryland and Virginia are part of the Mid-Atlantic. I feel you are one of the few in VA that think your living in NC. VA has been part of the Mid-Atlantic for centuries. Why would the definition change now? I'd love to hear your reason for this and why you are the only person that gets a say and doesn't even live in VA. I guess you feel that if VA is taken out of the Mid-Atlantic it's southern only? Words don't tell how an area is and what region it is part of. If you feel like changing a silly map to try and push your definition, feel free. It will be changed back eventually. I guess by the recent events in VA you are in that group who feel they need to "TAKE" back VA. VA will always be part of the Mid-Atlantic by all Virginians who classify themselves as that. A sill map will not define that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Futurearchitect91 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It is not just one person who has undone your edits. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's core content policies before making any further edits. Your edits on Mid-Atlantic states are discussed at Talk:Mid-Atlantic states, where you may participate (once the block is lifted) so long as you do it in a constructive manner. Nardog (talk) 05:33, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. GABgab 22:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)