User talk:Fuzzfolky

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Fuzzfolky. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! sats 01:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=591867780 your edit] to List of Rough Guide albums may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * * 1028: Cajun & Zydeco

Rough Guides
Hi Fuzz... I think we're both interested in the Rough Guide albums. Thanks so much for adding the catalogue numbers... two questions...

1) What do you think we should do about WMN albums that do not fit into the "Rough Guide" series? You have listed some there. Should I move the article to "List of World Music Network albums"? "RGNET" does seem to imply that they are part of the series, however, as "Introducing...", "Riverboat" etc are completely different.

2) What should we do about years? I sorted them first by year, second by catalogue number, in the interest of organization. Do you prefer eliminating year and only listing by catalogue number?

Cheers, PhnomPencil (talk) 18:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I've started the table using a few featured lists as a template... how's this? Albums with "Rough Guide" in the name are in bold, the others are not. PhnomPencil (talk) 19:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Phnom Pencil! I think your template looks excellent. It is so much better than what it looked like before. In my opinion it is best if we sort the releases after catalogue number since it is easier for people to find a release that way (and updating this list later on), but we should keep the year as well (just as in the template).

Cheers Fuzzfolky ([[User talk:Fuzzfolky|talk])] 13:30. 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * OK really glad to find someone else interested in these! I personally think the articles would have been made sooner but the number is so immense that it's been off-putting. When adding the catalogue numbers down the list, feel free to disregard the organization by year.


 * Also, feel free to make some album pages yourself... as you can see I've switched to adding by chronological order so you may want to start at 2005 or so just so we're not working on the same thing... or tell me what you're interested in so I'll skip it. The best way to make your first article is by copying-pasting from an existing one and slowly changing it to your topic. The sandbox is a useful place to experiment. If you've got any questions I'm here to help. PhnomPencil (talk) 16:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)