User talk:FvS~enwiki

--Merovingian 11:52, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello FvS! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 10 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Esmat Mansour -
 * 2) Jacquelynn Berube -
 * 3) Dirk Matschenz -
 * 4) Kelly Forbes -
 * 5) Koushun Tojo -
 * 6) Matthias Biedermann -
 * 7) Peter van Wees -
 * 8) Walter Stern -
 * 9) Yuzuru Hanyuuda -
 * 10) Iain Roberts -

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called FvS. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name FvS~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 13:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Kelly Forbes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly Forbes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kelly Forbes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 08:55, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter van Wees for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter van Wees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter van Wees until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cedric Tamani


The article Cedric Tamani has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A non-notable athlete. His accomplishments do not meet the threshold of WP:NATHLETE, and there is no coverage that would allow him to pass the WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 18:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Koshun Tojo


The article Koshun Tojo has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "On a search using both Japanese and English order of the subject's name, and his name in Japanese, I found no in-depth sources about the subject. German and Polish wiki articles are sourced only to databases and so can't mined for sources. Per WP:SPORTCRIT, we cannot keep articles solely on the basis of listing in databases."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 13:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)