User talk:Fvasconcellos/Archive 17

Archaea
Maybe one day, I thought it would be a good companion-piece to bacteria. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:12, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Simpler diff method
I hunted down those diffs by painstakingly going through every edit on temazepam since last September until I found the offending edits 70 had removed...do you know of a script or some simpler way of determining when a particular block of text was added, and by whom? If not, it would be tremendously beneficial to create such a tool, although I am not familiar enough with the technical side of WP's operations to know how it could be done. Just a thought. Thanks! St3vo (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * See Tools. Tim Vickers (talk) 00:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah. One for the bookmark folder :P Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

thanks
Hi Fvasconcellos, thanks for the greeting, and sorry for the late response. Offline matters are keeping me busy, so I don't expect to edit much in the near future. Thanks again! -- Kyok o  16:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Alt-rock
Noticed your comments on the WP:ALM talk page. What bands/styles are you into? WesleyDodds (talk) 04:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Based on your tastes, I'd suggest checking out Hüsker Dü, Sugar, The Chameleons, and Mission of Burma, if you haven't already. While not strictly alt-rock through and through, I bet you would really like Echo & the Bunnymen. WesleyDodds (talk) 08:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * This is my favorite Bunnymen song . WesleyDodds (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

FYI
Since you asked, I pulled my finger out and got on with it. Featured article candidates/Archaea‎. Tim Vickers (talk) 04:19, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Illustrations
I moved the discussion here since this is where I'm doing most of the work.

After seeing Philip_Greenspun_illustration_project this I thought - that's doomed. How can you pay someone who can earn $100/hour $40 for an illustration that takes hours of work and expect that he will do it for the money? We are volunteers, plain and simple. So I tried to think of a solution:

I'm trying to drive an overhaul of the illustrator / 3D modeler movement but I don't have the experience. I posted some interesting requests at the Graphics Lab (thanks for your excellent contribution) to try and revive interest from the more experienced crew and I'm working on Portal:Computer Generated Imagery to try and give illustrators a showcase, higher profile & a more user friendly experience. Many want requests on their talk pages so we need to streamline the process. I'm also working on this to catalog and categorise skills and requested images to eventually go into the Portal (sorry you are not in yet, I will rectify this once I finish Schrodinger's cat)

The idea is this: we have all illustrators ranked in terms of skills (Vector 2D, Raster 2D (technical), artistic, 3D modelling, map making, other?) and activity (avg time to respond to request & time to completion). When a request comes in - I'm talking about serious, large scale requests that need significant input from a pro - not Graphics Lab type quick conversions and cleanups - we categorise the request, clean it up and clarify, provide appropriate links to online resources or bounce it back to the applicant for this info.

Then we assign the request to an artist based on the rating of the artist in the relevant field, turnaround time & current workload and place the request on their talk page (as so many require) automagically. They can accept or reject and if they accept it stays with them for 2? weeks before the request is assigned to someone else. Review for signoff as completed is by the community. Complex to set up, but a good way to get illustrators who can't code or navigate WP to contribute in their chosen way - art, not admin.

Sorry for the book-length post, but I want to bounce the idea off some experienced editors and request help setting this up. The Portal setup alone has me quite puzzled and I'm torn between doing images and working on the Portal. What are your thoughts? Dhatfield (talk) 14:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I actually think it's a great idea, but... I don't think a Portal was the way to go; Portals are meant to showcase Wikipedia content, not serve as venues for project administration-related stuff (and yes, this does fall into the "back office" sort of work). What you're thinking belongs in project space, and it would basically be an extension of the Graphics Lab, at least in scope. Why not establish a procedure within the GL whereby (I can't believe I just used the word whereby) a large-scale or stale request is referred to a specific illustrator—whether a Wikigraphist who hangs around the GL or a pro who usually works on his or her own priorities—for consideration? I don't want to cut off your enthusiasm on such a great idea, but I think creating this as a "counterpoint" to the Graphics Lab for really major requests would be unnecessary overlap, and would inevitably lead to cobweb buildup at either venue with time. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I completely agree but I think it's potentially a both, rather than an either-or. Lets face it, a lot of highly skilled volunteers do the work (at least partly) for ego reasons - I'd be lying if I said I didn't get a kick out of producing a FP. If illustrators and 3D artists are not getting the same coverage as our photographic cousins (oops, I actually said it), they may feel that their work is being overlooked and taken for granted.


 * At the same time, I think that a mechanism to refer challenging and/or stale requests is a very good idea. However, if we are asking for a higher quality of work, we (generally) need a higher quality of request. Maybe a format similar to that used by User:WikipedianProlific

Page URL*:

Diagram Description*:

List any Similar Pictures Already Online:

Related Articles/Websites that Might help me:


 * We need to get all of those guys who signed up as Illustrators to find a focus for their activities. Not sure if referrals will bring in new blood, but it's a good compromise and avoids the cobweb problem. Undaunted, I will work on the PR side (never thought I would say that) and keep spamming GL with challenging requests *hee hee* - not sure what needs to be done to set up a 'referral mechanism / procedure'. Dhatfield (talk) 18:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Temazepam
Thank you for the good work. I have dared to do a few minor edits on (I believe) agreed issues. I also left several discussion points, please take a look and comment. I am concerned that the original editors are not around for comment. I had that before, complete silence, so I edited and left comments on the talk page for discussion. Then suddenly all was reverted, also without comment and discussion and a vandalism charge brought up, also attempted conflict of interest. Also I would be a drug abuser, coo coo, psychotic, neurotic, completely subjective in interpretation of refs, not understanding the issues etc. Similar has happened to RJSampson before (not a sock puppet of mine). Goodson expressed his opinion that disagreeing editors are drug abusers. See entry of WP:Pharm, recruiting temazepam editors by RJSampson. Also RJSampsons talk page. (In January) I believe my points are at least worth a discussion. (RJSampson simply backed off after his experience) 70.137.161.241 (talk) 21:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No objection to your recent edits from me. I'll have a fresh look at the discussion page tomorrow. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 08:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Pharma FAs
Thanks for reminding me - I have two articles - Gyromitra esculenta and Willie Wagtail teetering on the edge of nomination, and was working on Major Depressive Disorder, but the good news is we have some templates in Buproprion and Sertraline. I will refresh myself on it later today. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Happy Independence Day!
As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, -- Happy Independence Day!   Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 04:09, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Have a great weekend yourself, and I hope you had some nice fireworks in your neck of the woods :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

SAH
Done, thanks for catching that! delldot  talk  20:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Temazepam
Could you take a look at the article? I have done some edits. Unfortunately nobody discusses. 70.137.181.232 (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

page protection on Real Life Ministries
Hi - I'm contacting you since you are the protecting admin on the Real Life Ministries page. I've been doing some research on long-term page protection policy (in general, not about that page in particular) and noticed that page has been protected since March 20.

It looks like there's been no activity or discussion there since March 30 so I wonder if maybe the protection is no longer needed and you might like to unprotect it.

I don't edit that page, so this is not a personal request, just something that came up related to the research I've been doing.

Thanks and have a good day... --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 03:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Temazepam
Polished over Abuse chapter. Not yet finished. Also some more minor edits, duplicates. Next consolidating duplicates in Abuse and compacting to concise facts. Please take a look. 70.137.181.232 (talk) 08:26, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Consolidated Article to concise facts. 70.137.181.232 (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll have another look. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Miraculin
Hi, can you come up with a diagram for Miraculin? Badagnani (talk) 20:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Ha, I hadn't heard of that one. Strange that the structure hasn't been published, as it's been talked about since the 1970s. Badagnani (talk) 20:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

DSM-IV Proposal
Can you check out our DSM-IV proposal and provide any feedback? Thanks Mindsite (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Temazepam
Please take a look. Comments? 70.137.181.232 (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Same as above—will have another look... :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Linagliptin
Hi there. Linagliptin is now listed in the WHO's International Nonproprietary Name lists, under list 99. Could you please re-create the article? :-) Carlo Banez (talk) 13:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done :D Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok. I'll add the article in the list of drugs. :-) Carlo Banez (talk) 13:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Font fix, thanks.
Tim Vickers and you have been really helpful so thanks for jumping to help a new user. I'm thinking I might just stick around :) --RegisFrey (talk) 03:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Anytime. And I hope you'll stay—Wikipedia isn't that bad a place to hang around ;) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Gallery on Portal:Computer generated imagery/Selected picture
Would you please take a look at your gallery on the Portal. You are just too prolific (Yay for you!) to fit all of your images in a reasonable download package. I have trimmed as I saw fit, but I'd really appreciate your input on omitted images that should be in or vice versa. Thanks. Dhatfield (talk) 12:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, I'm flattered! I think I'll replace a couple of skeletal structures with more recent ones (I don't draw them in the first two styles anymore), but that's it. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: CNTO 1275
Hello. Could you please move CNTO 1275 to Ustekinumab, its INN?. :-) Carlo Banez (talk) 17:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done. I'll add a Drugbox as well. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tiffin logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tiffin logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Kareena Kapoor
Hi I was wondering if you could give this article a good copy edit and help prepare it for FA. If you have any pointers for improvement please join the peer review. Thanks  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 10:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Yes it could do with some work. It might be good for a few decent editors who are unfamiliar with the subject to see what they can do in terms of grammar, tone style etc. Cheers buddy  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 16:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

updated WP:PHARM banner for C-class
I think I updated the pharmacology project banner to put C-class articles into the appropriate category (previously, it was putting them into the unassessed class. If you want to double-check, that would be great; I think it may take a little while for it to update the articles? Dr. Cash (talk) 15:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Dr. Cash (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you...
...for this. I got distracted between addressing the request and telling people that I had addressed the request. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Portal link
The image is probably a good idea. I wasn't sure how to do that right away, though I did see an image on the energy portal link on the ethanol page. I think the image with the pills looks a bit better; the symbol is just plain and black and doesn't really do much as far as advertising goes.

I've linked to the portal from all of the WP:PHARM articles that are FA & GA level. I suppose we could add it to the B & C class articles as well (I don't think we have any A-class articles currently). I'm not worried about adding it to the starts & stubs -- not much content there yet,...

The portal itself has also been updated a bit, too. Dr. Cash (talk) 14:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Adding it to B-class articles is probably a good idea as well, though I'm not sure about C-class. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Phenothiazine
Reading the phenothiazine article, I learn that phenothiazine is an insecticide and vermicide. It is also a rubber vulcanizing chemical. In neuroleptics the absorption and bioavailability of phenothiazine is enhanced by the addition of an aminoalkyl side chain, or by addition of piperidine, which is fireant venom and causes the neuroleptic burning, stinging side effects. Once in the brain, it has insecticidal effects, by being a carbamate and acting as a anticholinesterase blocking inhibitor.I would like to add a paragraph elucidating how the phenothiazine also has a vulcanizing action on the softened brain tissue, thereby helping against brain rot. Fixed it, best as I could. wtf is that? 70.137.181.232 (talk) 07:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

SVGs
Hi Fvasconcellos. Yeah I started using a new drawing program which is able to output SMILES strings for structures that my old one couldn't, makes it much easier to find compounds on PubChem as the online drawing tool for the PubChem structure search is kind of buggy. However the new drawing program doesn't handle SVGs that well, comes up with weird errors, so I've been using PNGs instead. I know its not the preferred format but I actually think they look nicer, and the file size isn't that much bigger. I've been outputting them all at 200% size so the quality stays good. Hope this isn't a problem! Meodipt (talk) 22:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Central America
Hi I've begun working on the municipalities of Central America and creating some templates and developing some articles like Apastepeque I did earlier. Howver could you do me a favor and move the articles out of brackets in Category:Departments of Guatemala, Category:Departments of Honduras and Category:Departments of Nicaragua to ..... Department. Its a standard naming convention. I moved some of the Guatemalan ones earlier but many can't be moved because of double redirects. Could you help me? E.g Totonicapán (department) should be Totonicapán Department. Everyone except Santa Rosa (Guatemalan department) and La Paz (Honduran department). ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 20:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, will do. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Cheers buddy. Without a doubt you are one of the most helpful editors I've come across on here, I'm very impressed. Hey you did a lot of work on Brazil a while back didn't you. After I;ve done central America, Brazilian municipalities is next to tackle. MOst of them need proper maps and locators and basic referenced statistics. I'll probably get around to that around mid to late August  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 08:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)