User talk:Fvsegarra

February 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2freehosting.com. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Ruby  Murray  23:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

2freehosting.com
Please note, per the notice at the top of the article, 2freehosting.com "Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed."

Also, the links you added do not meet Wikipedia's criteria for being reliable sources; please read WP:RS to learn what meets that criteria. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding links that fail to meet Wikipedia's criteria of being a reliable source. Please read WP:RS. Non-reliable sources include adverts, discussions in chat pages/forums, directory listings, etc. The links are simply not adequate nor even appropriate for use on Wikipedia. -- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at 2freehosting.com. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Ruby  Murray  23:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at 2freehosting.com. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Francisco Leopoldo Villalba Segarra. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you.  { MordeKyle }  &#9762; 02:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fran Villalba Segarra


A tag has been placed on Fran Villalba Segarra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Cabayi (talk) 12:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Fran Villalba Segarra. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 12:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Cabayi (talk) 12:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * All your edits and those of User:Gsgsf343, including those deleted, have been to promote Fran Villalba Segarra, who I assume is you, given your username, Fvsegarra, and a company, 2freehosting.com, with which he was associated. I don't see any other contributions to the encyclopedia since your account was created in February 2014 and so I don’t see any point in keeping you around. I have blocked you indefinitely as clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia. As you say that the Gsgsf343 account belongs to you also, I will block that account indefinitely as well. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:45, 13 September 2017 (UTC)