User talk:Fwey1

Welcome!
Hello, Fwey1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Garlic does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zefr (talk) 19:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Feedback on edit
Dear Zefr. I really appreciate your feedback regarding the contribution that I made on the "garlic" page and your help with directions for improvement. Before editing or adding content on Wikipedia again, I will spend the right amount of time to understand all guidelines. The only question I have is regarding the following comment that you made: "Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media." I included credible sources, such as a research conducted by USP (Sao Paulo University), that is the most important University in Brazil and one of the most recognized in Latin America. I have also added materials from The Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, a state-owned research corporation affiliated with the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture. Even the Wikipedia page in Portuguese mention the garlic variety that I included in the English verion. (please see "alho" on Wikipedia). So, why these sources are not credible? Some of the content I added as a reference/ source is in Portuguese, and my impression is that no one read or tried to translate before removing the paragraph that I included. I would understand a feedback regarding the way the paragraph was written, but I can not agree with the comment about the credibility of the sources. My intention was to contribute to Wikipedia because I know the page regarding Garlic is incomplete and I hope we can find a proper manner of making this adjustment. Thank you once again for your feedback and support. Best Fwey1 (Fwey1 (talk) 21:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC))
 * you said:
 * Please provide English source(s) if possible please, and post a new revision first on the Garlic Talk page so I and other editors can review it. Thanks. --Zefr (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)