User talk:G.Hergarden

Feedback on your article
Hello G.Hergarden, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before/during our meeting today. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 08:28, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: good
 * Links: sufficient
 * Headers: sufficient
 * Context/timeframe: Wikipedia wise sufficient, your teacher should check content wise.
 * How was the book received: can we still expect more paragraphs? The sentence with "critics often proclaimed" needs a reference.
 * References: Please add references behind the dot.
 * Other: "During Henry D. Thoreau's lifetime Walden was largely ignored" -> this suggests that at some point in time it was read more, I did not see this in your article, did I miss it?