User talk:G.M.Hiram

Nomination of Valentin Bura for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valentin Bura, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Valentin Bura until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm JayBeeEll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. JBL (talk) 11:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. JBL (talk) 13:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

COI
Hello, G.M.Hiram. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Valentin Bura, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 12:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

No COI here. And I'd like to know who I'm speaking with, that is, your true identity. Thanks. --G.M.Hiram (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Er, you disclosed a very close connection indeed here, which certainly falls under our conflict of interest rules. You can see my real name (which I edit under). Russ Woodroofe (talk) 13:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

No I have not disclosed anything. It is you database insertion. I am sorry I cannot reveal my true identity, having received death threats. Apart from this, no COIs.--G.M.Hiram (talk) 13:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Please stop embarrassing yourself like this: it just makes you look foolish and wastes time for everyone else. --JBL (talk) 13:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Noam Greenberg


The article Noam Greenberg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Created by COI editor for self-promotion; sources do not show notability for academics. See Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Bilorv ( talk ) 21:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, including but not limited to self-promotion. G.M.Hiram, report any threats of harm to the police in your area or to WP:EMERGENCY. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --            El_C (talk) 22:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)