User talk:GAPeach0583

Hello, I'm Saturn star. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Saturn star (talk) 22:12, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, GAPeach0583. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Graeham Goble, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 22:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Your recent editing history at Graeham Goble shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Graeham Goble. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Amaury (talk) 22:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Graeham Goble
You need to have Graeham Goble contact the Volunteer Response Team (OTRS). Wikipedia has no way of telling who you are and if you are working for him. And telling people to contact him is not the way to go about this. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

I act on his behalf. He would not have any idea of how to contact anyone on Wikipedia. He did not create his Wikibio. I and one other person did under his direction. I have created a User page. If you want to verify the instructions from the subject himself, email him at.


 * That's not how it works, anyone could be claiming to be acting on behalf of Graeham Goble. Wikipedia rules state that he needs to contact the Volunteer Response Team (OTRS), as this is the only way that we can be sure these are his intentions. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Mr. Goble did not create his page. Therefore, for me to tell him (which I just mentioned to him in an email message) to contact Volunteer Response Team will just be confusing since he does not know how to use Wikipedia. He is a musician and world-renown music producer and has other people do these things for him. We have contacted the person that set up the page to see if he can successfully remove the section. This guy and I are the only ones in the whole world who have editing privileges for Mr. Goble's Wiki page.


 * I'm not sure who you mean by this guy but you do not WP:OWN the Graeham Goble article. Right now the only people who can edit it are administrators and after a week anybody can make changes to it. Having him contact the OTRS is not the same as editing Wikipedia. If he can use email, which according to you he can, then the OTRS shouldn't be a problem. You could assist him and get this all solved very quickly. And finally stop posting his email. You are doing him no favours with that as he will be subject to spam. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I also removed his email from my talkpage. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)