User talk:GA Brac

Welcome!
Hello, GA Brac, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Alley of Angels did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Introduction to referencing
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Cakelot1 (talk) 07:48, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alley of Angels, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Just to be clear, we use reliable sources. Wikipedia is not a reliable source (WP:RSPWP ) and neither is a search engine result screen. The BBC is a good source as are most academic journals. WP:RSP gives a good view of the sort of sources we can and can't use. You can't discount a source because it's "Political" or "Biased". Instead you need to find actually Reliable sources which contradict those in the article.

The lack of RSs is the reason this is being deleted so removing the few we have only brings it to be deleted faster. It would be appreciated if you could discuss this before removing the sources again.'' Cakelot1 (talk) 16:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)