User talk:GAkash

October 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Vishwakarma (caste) has been reverted. Your edit here to Vishwakarma (caste) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://viswakarmasuvarnakar.jimdo.com/, https://tamilviswabrahmin.jimdo.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ramgarhia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 12:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tarkhan (Punjab), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 12:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ramgarhia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 13:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Sanctions
Hi, you are copying huge chunks of mostly trivial material into many articles. It is unsourced and has the look of being copy/pasted from somewhere else. Please do not do this. The information below is relevant. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 13:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Your addition to Panchal has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 13:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Final warning
It is clear that you are here to promote some sort of agenda and are refusing to get familiar with our policies and guidelines. Your editing privileges will be revoked if this behavior continues. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not being able to understand what an encylclopaedia is or showing an ability/intention to follow our policies and guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)