User talk:GB-Ecko1

July 2009
Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I argue this statement of it's entirety. The only editing done was done completely in my own words and on my own hand.User:GB-Ecko1 (complaint) 10:42, 6 July 2009


 * The "summaries" you added were completely useless and read like teasers out of the TV guide. In your edit summary you implied that you had taken the summaries from episode previews. Please cease such efforts. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

If that is the main issue at the base of my edited overviews, then I fail to see the validity of the summaries given and permitted for Episodes #1, #4, and #11. If the wish is to have the topic better written, that can be accomplished. If that is the only case, than I can see nor find any reason to deny the reviews/summaries that I wish to add. User:GB-Ecko1 (confirmation) 11:07, 6 July 2009

In extension to to the prier statement no material is taken from any others sites, or site of any kind. All work is posted directly from me. Given from my own personal view of each episode in question. So there is no possible connection to any form of copy written material. User:GB-Ecko1 (extension) 11:26, 6 July 2009


 * Wikipedia is also not the place for your personal views on episodes, nor do we just add worthless teasers just to have "something" there. Thanks for pointing out the ones that snuck in. I've removed them. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 04:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

What are summaries but a summation of a whole, that a person has seen/read, then written about afterwords? In that it is not my personal views in the sense of an opinion ,but more in the sense of that is what factually happens. My main question is what are you looking for in a summary of those TV Series shows? I have seen many of them, and I am watching more. So I need to know what is and isn't permitted by you, so that I may properly fill in where the site lacks. User:GB-Ecko1 (Question) 2:30, 7 July 2009


 * A summary is not a review nor is it your "personal view of each episode" - per your own words. A summary is a factual summary of the events in the episode without personal interpretation, explanation, views, etc. For what is a valid summary, look at some FL episode lists and the Manual of Style for Television articles (see the episode list section). Summaries should be 100-300 words, briefly describe the major plot points of the episode, including the ending, and avoid interpreting any events from it. For some FL lists you can look at that have good episode summaries that meet Wikipedia's guidelines, see List of Meerkat Manor episodes, Veronica Mars (season 2), List of One Piece episodes (season 5), List of Oh My Goddess! episodes, and List of Popotan episodes. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 19:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)