User talk:GDuwen/Archive 2

Good Article
Well done. Good work.  SilkTork  *YES! 15:34, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Willie Nelson
I would say break it up by segment. Start with his early life (before the first single release) and then flesh it out as much as you can. Then work on the first years, middle years, later years, present day. At the very least, all of his major albums and hits should be mentioned by name, and there should be a section comprising sourced info on his musical style. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll try to add to it this week. I just woke up so I'm really out of it right now. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Did do ..i will also look at the page...let me find some book sources.Moxy (talk) 19:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

I have responded to your question on my talk page. --Rschmertz (talk) 01:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Willie Nelson
The article Willie Nelson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Willie Nelson for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Rachel Weisz
The article is much closer to what I think is proper in terms of WP:WIAFA's 1(b) & 1(c) criteria.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Good job on the article so far. I would definitely recommend addressing the issues currently raised at the FAC. Many of the citations definitely use additional parameters including author, while some of the sources should be removed if not deemed reliable (such as IMDB). Check and see if there are any current biographies that could be used to further source the article. When the article has the complete and more developed citations, I think it'll have a better shop at completing the FAC successfully. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look at it - also worth dropping a note on the talkpages of the film and actor projects.  Lugnuts  (talk) 18:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Jennifer Connelly
It probably is in the range of articles that conforms to the general WP:WIAFA for the most part. There are certainly going to be specific issues that you will need to address. If you are willing to be very responsive to the feedback, you might have a shot. However, you might want to try a visit to the WP:PR.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Good article review help: Netball in the Cook Islands
Hi. I nominated Netball in the Cook Islands for a good article. As you're part of WikiProject Polynesia, I was wondering if you could help review the article. If not, could you do the assessment for article as part of the project, level of importance and if it is at least worth a B? Thanks! --LauraHale (talk) 08:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the feedback on my talk page. I tried to incorporate the advice where I could.  This is the first article I've written from scratch that I'm trying to get into a b article really only the second article that I've put a lot of effort into writing. --LauraHale (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Copy-edit of Rachel Weisz
I finished going through the article for copy-edits, as you had requested. I didn't have any major issues, though I did trim a few quotes down quite sternly for brevity's sake, and added some direct quotation where applicable. If there's any issue with my revision of the article, let me know, and good luck with the FA nomination. GRAPPLE  X  21:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Jennifer Connelly PR
Sure. Just let me know when you'd like me to take another look. Finetooth (talk) 02:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The layout is looking much better to me down to the top of the "Personal life" section, and I assume you're not done yet. I probably wouldn't have noticed the navbox space if you hadn't pointed it out. Finetooth (talk) 03:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. I'd just leave it alone unless someone else notices it and grumbles. The grumbler might be able to suggest a work-around. Finetooth (talk) 17:23, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm putting it on the top of my to-do list for Tuesday morning. I'm a little too brain-fried just now to trust my judgment. Finetooth (talk) 03:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. It looks very good. I posted a brief set of comments to the bottom of the Peer review. Finetooth (talk) 16:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you could nominate now. As far as comprehensiveness goes, I'm assuming that you've looked at WP:FA to assure yourself that you've covered the bases. I think you have, but I don't have any special knowledge about J. Connelly. Almost everything I know about her I learned from reading your article. Finetooth (talk) 19:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Before taking the article to FAC, you'll need to close the peer review. Just follow the instructions at the top of WP:PR that relate to closing the PR. Then go to WP:FAC and follow the instructions there for nominating the article. As you follow the steps in both sets of instructions, related things will happen to the article's talk page either because you do them or because a robot does them. All of this eventually becomes part of the article history without any further action on your part. Just be sure to read the instructions at PR and FAC carefully and follow them exactly. I often keep two screens open when I'm doing this so I can flip back and forth between a page of instructions and the page I am altering. Holler if you run into trouble (but I don't think you will). Finetooth (talk) 22:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You are most welcome, and thank you for the barnstar. Good luck at FAC. Finetooth (talk) 23:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * GDuwen, I've been caught up in a difficult FLC and have not responded to your last note, about problems with the PR or FAC instructions. I see that you've figured everything out and that the FAC nomination encountered strong headwinds immediately. Please don't be discouraged; the problems noted by the reviewer looked fixable. If you'd like me to have another look at some point, don't hesitate to ask. Finetooth (talk) 17:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi. My thought is to copyedit the article and to make small direct changes rather than making a complete list of small things to pass along to you. If that's OK with you, I'll do that tomorrow (Monday). If I encounter anything complicated or that I'm not pretty sure about, I'll make a list and pass it along. Will that work? Finetooth (talk) 19:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you tell me where to look for the recent FAC comments? I read them, but they are no longer at FAC, and I'm not sure where they've gone. Finetooth (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That was very helpful. I started with very first suggestion, that the citations were inconsistent, incomplete, and in some cases unreliable. That turned out to be true, and I'm sorry I missed these things in my hurried peer review. I have gone carefully through the first 12 citations and posted comments about each to the article's talk page (Talk:Jennifer Connelly) and suggested that someone look closely at the rest. Please ask if any of my comments don't make sense. Finetooth (talk) 18:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I would accept starpulse as reliable for the mild claim in the article. Starpulse seems to be an entertainment news site that's probably vetted by an editor or editors. It's tabloid-ish but, I think, more reliable than a personal blog or other one-person page. Starpulse credits World Entertainment News Network for the Connelly story, which further supports the idea that the claim is based on research and was vetted by somebody paid to be careful. I'll look at other aspects of the article later today. Finetooth (talk) 18:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I did another proofing and found little to fix beyond an occasional change to punctuation. I see only two remaining problems. The link in Citation 103 has gone dead. It's acceptable in a case like this to cite the paper version rather than the on-line version, but you need the publication date and page number to make the citation complete. The other problem is related to this one. The last paragraph of the "Personal life" section mentions Jeffrey Oing's decision to prevent construction until March 11, 2011. Since that date has come and gone, readers will want to know what happened after that. Maybe you can find a later update in the Wall Street Journal or elsewhere and eliminate Citation 103 by replacing it with a newer citation. Other than that, I don't see any problems. That doesn't mean that other editors won't spot any or ask questions about things I haven't thought of. FAC is always a bit unpredictable, but this article looks solid to me. Finetooth (talk) 23:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks fine to me. Finetooth (talk) 19:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * If I were the nominator, I'd wait until the full two weeks had gone by even if technically it might not be necessary. There's no particular hurry that I know of. And, yes, if you have further questions as things go along, I'll try to answer them. However, I have no special knowledge about Jennifer Connelly; you are the content expert. I might not be able to answer every imaginable question. Finetooth (talk) 19:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * As you saw, the date formatting problem is solved. I'm sure you also noticed that I plunged ahead and began changing many of the details in the citations. To do that, I had to check them one by one, linking through to the source. Although I had done that earlier with the first 10 citations or so, I did not do it with the rest but simply advised that it should be done. I've been finding the same kinds of small errors in the others as I did in the first 10 and fixing them as I go. A lot of them might seem deeply nitpicky, but the The New York Times is the correct name of that particular newspaper, for example, and New York Times is not. Also, overlinking in the citations tends to occur when anything but the title (automatically linked) is linked; you end up with things like "The New York Times" being linked multiple times and creating an unnecessary sea of blue in the "Reference" section. I removed lots of it. At least two citations are problems, I think, that you will need to address. Citation 47 doesn't seem to connect to the source; I've tried several times to connect, and I don't know what's wrong. Citation 62 links to a blog entry, and I don't think it's a reliable source. I may have more to say later. Finetooth (talk) 17:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * With IMDb, I'm not sure. Since the source is only supporting the claim that Time thinks she's beautiful, I think you could safely delete Time from the list and delete the IMDb source as well. If the Time claim is accurate, it should appear in an edition of Time itself. However, spending a lot of time tracking that down seems like time not well spent, at least to me. Others say she is beautiful, and I doubt that anyone will challenge the claim, which has other support. Finetooth (talk) 21:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hank Williams
The article Hank Williams you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hank Williams for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm, it seems that the article had some tinkering with, as I reviewed this version (I think). I would suggest re-nominating the article, as I don't have time to review an article very soon, so it will probably be faster to renom it. Sorry about the misunderstanding! :-( Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Jennifer Connelly
Hi, just to let you know that the copyedit you requested on the Jennifer Connelly article on the GOCE requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome. ► Philg88 ◄ star.png 11:33, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Monologue of Love Jennifer Connelly.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Monologue of Love Jennifer Connelly.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Help Needed - Willie Nelson
Hi, sometime ago (if you remember) you reviewed one of the articles I've worked on (Heartbreak Hotel). Since I know that you're a fine reviewer, I just wanted to know if you would review Willie Nelson's article, currently on GA nominations. In case that you don't have time or any other kind of issue, it's OK. The article has been nominated for a while now and for your work as a reviewer previously, I know that you do it very well. Thanks for your valuable time.-- GD uwen    Tell me!   19:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * OK.  SilkTork  *YES! 22:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Here We Go Again: Celebrating the Genius of Ray Charles
I noticed that you created Here We Go Again: Celebrating the Genius of Ray Charles before a lot of the reviews came out. You might want to revisit it. I stumbled upon a bunch of reviews. See below for some.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2011/03/album-review-here-we-go-again-celebrating-the-genius-of-ray-charles-with-willie-nelson-wynton-marsal.html
 * http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/here-we-go-again-celebrating-the-genius-of-ray-charles-20110413
 * http://www.texasmonthly.com/preview/2011-04-01/cdrev2
 * http://www.metacritic.com/music/here-we-go-again-celebrating-the-genius-of-ray-charles

You may want to nominate it at DYK or GAC. I am working on Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song). You may want to link all notable songs in the track listing section. One thing I am curious about is whether there is a relevant singles release chronology because I would be interested if the song I am working on is being rereleased as a new cover.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * All albums have release dates, but they often also have specific release dates for individual singles, but it sounds like you don't know much more about researching those than I. Just to take a random album, look at Circus (Britney Spears album).  Notice that different singles were released for radio airplay on different dates. Although for a Marsalis album, this might be unusual, it is probably common for both Nelson and Jones albums.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Good work on the tracks. I hope you nominated this at DYK. You should probably also link the songwriters and fill in the missing ones.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:52, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I have a copy of the album from the Chicago Public Library. I added a bit to the article. If you have any questions let me know. I don't know if you want a music WP:SAMPLE from the album. Several of the songs are mentioned in the text. Ping my talk page with anything.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I also could use an opinion at Talk:Here_We_Go_Again_(Ray_Charles_song).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I have added the other sample that you requested.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * GL at WP:GAC.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Why did you withdraw the nomination?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 11:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I have never done a GA for an album. Take the article to WP:PR for feedback.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Willie Nelson/GA2
Willie Nelson is going through a GAN, and is on hold for an initial seven days to allow issues, mainly prose, to be addressed. Help is requested and welcome.  SilkTork  *Tea time 17:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I have posted the article to the Guild, and I will try to asses the issues of the article as well. As you said, most likely it will take more than a seven day period. I will do my best to invest my free time working on this (lately my work has been weighting heavy on my time), but still it can be done.-- GD uwen    Tell me!   18:11, 15 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks GD. I will do what I can as well, time permitting. Whatever happens, the article should improve. If the work cannot be done in a reasonable timespace, then the article can be nominated again in the future. The GA project is fairly accommodating.  SilkTork  *Tea time 18:18, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hello Walls.ogg
 Thanks for uploading File:Hello Walls.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Here We Go Again: Celebrating the Genius of Ray Charles
The DYK project (nominate) 17:48, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Good work. Go for a WP:GAC.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Peer review
Sorry. I'm taking a half-holiday from intense reviewing (or intense much of anything except listening to Emmylou Harris and riding my bicycle). I wish you the best with Jennifer Connelly. Finetooth (talk) 02:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Here We Go Again: Celebrating the Genius of Ray Charles
I advise that you withdraw this GA nomination for now. It is lacking in background/recording info and reception material. The reception section can be greatly expanded using the reviews posted at MetaCritic, and there is no charting information (it appeared on the Billboard Jazz Albums and Austrian Albums Chart). See The Fame or My World (EP) for good album reception sections (I know they're pop albums but the articles are well-written and can be good models). Adabow (talk · contribs) 23:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * They are both nearly ready. You need to remove the reviews from the infobox and adapt them into Album ratings, and cite sources for all the chart positions. Try to structure the article similar to other album GAs and FAs, see WP:GA/A and WP:FA for examples. Good luck! Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Re:RHS: You need to add reviews to the ratings box until it has ten reviews (or you can't find any more). The reviews should also be discussed in prose. The table of charts needs citations. Lastly, don't continually refer to "the album" - name it. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

More on Jennifer Connelly
I made a few minor changes to your article on this beautiful lady, plus a suggestion that you can find on the talk page. &mdash; Jimknut (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

I have given my support for this article. Good job! &mdash; Jimknut (talk) 19:29, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm still laying low and don't feel ready to re-review JC. Best of luck with it. Finetooth (talk) 01:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not sure what you are asking me to do. I would be glad to peer review it again, but do not have time to do a copyedit or to check things off against the FAC. Please note that PRs are supposed to wait 2 weeks after a FAC or PR closes - the idea is to address the issues in the FAC or previous PR first, and only then open a new PR. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 23:23, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks - once you believe all the FAC comments have been addressed, then let me know and you can open a PR early if need be. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 17:12, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I will be glad to look at it, though it may take me some time. I thought I had already replied here, sorry for the delay. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 12:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

I finally made some comments at Peer review/Jennifer Connelly/archive3, mostly language tweaks. The PR is archived (how I saw I had not commented yet - I check the PRs archived ny the bot each day - sorry again), but you can still make comments on it if you want. Archiving just means it is not transcluded at WP:PR. Please let me know when it is at FAC and I will comment there - seems pretty close to me (all my suggestions are language nitpicks). Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 11:55, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You are very welcome. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 04:00, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:12, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of King Creole
Hello! Your submission of King Creole at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! OCNative (talk) 07:52, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of King Creole at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Bruce1eetalk 10:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Willie Nelson
Well done.  SilkTork   ✔Tea time  10:53, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Re:Ducie Island
Email me and I'll send it back to you. J Milburn (talk) 22:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Sent. J Milburn (talk) 23:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, were you ready for me to give the article another look through? J Milburn (talk) 14:08, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the massive delay. I'll give it another read through (hopefully tomorrow) and work out where to go from here. J Milburn (talk) 00:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Simbrio negro1.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Simbrio negro1.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

King Creole
Hey, sorry for such a late reply, been a little busy elsewhere. However, today I got a chance to look at the King Creole article and I think you've done some excellent work on it. I tidied up some general grammar and spelling mistakes, but other than that I think it's in quite good condition. I haven't checked every section so there may be some more G & S mistakes needing fixed, but I'll get around to having a look at that over the next few days. I'll have another look at some of my books to see if there's any new info that could be added to the article to help educate the reader a little more, too. Thanks. ElvisFan1981 (talk) 18:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Please observe inuse tags
Hi GDuWen. Thanks for dealing with the points I raised, but please could you make absolutely sure not to edit while inuse or GOCEinuse are in effect, as shown by the box at the top of the page. Fortunately, I was out for a few minutes and no edit conflict occurred, but doing this runs a very high risk of creating an edit conflict and is not fair while I am doing the copyedit you requested. In future, please wait until a remove the box or change it to under construction, which is what I do overnight if I plan to return later. Thanks. --Stfg (talk) 16:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. I've replied on my talk page, so as to keep it threaded. Best, --Stfg (talk) 19:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ducie Island
The article Ducie Island you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Ducie Island for things which need to be addressed. – Quadell (talk) 19:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Naomi Watts
The article Naomi Watts you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Naomi Watts for things which need to be addressed.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:16, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Actors and geography.. We have a lot in common!♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
ww2censor (talk) 01:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hank Williams
The article Hank Williams you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Hank Williams for things which need to be addressed. (Of course, you've already been working on it. It's great to work with a nominator who's really prepared to do what it takes to bring an article up to GA status!) – Quadell (talk) 19:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Your improvements have been excellent. Just this morning, I realized that I had forgotten to finish my review of the lede. I found two final points that need attention, and there is still one remaining issue in the "Early career" section. I also wanted to make sure you're okay with a change I made to the 1950s section. Once these final things are done, it'll be ready for promotion. Thanks! – Quadell (talk) 13:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Agglomeration community of Annemasse - Les Voirons Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Agglomeration community of Annemasse - Les Voirons Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of King Creole
The article King Creole you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:King Creole for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shotgun Willie
The article Shotgun Willie you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Shotgun Willie for things which need to be addressed. ♫GoP♫ T C N 14:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

New GA - Congrats!
-- ♫GoP♫ T C N 11:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Another GA!
♫GoP♫ T C N 17:10, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stardust (Willie Nelson album)
The article Stardust (Willie Nelson album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Stardust (Willie Nelson album) for things which need to be addressed. ♫GoP♫ T <sup style="color:red;">C <sub style="color:red;">N 11:47, 1 December 2011 (UTC)