User talk:GDuwen/Archive 8

Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article "Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas)" has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for your work, much appreciated!-- GDuwen  Holler!  22:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kui Lee
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kui Lee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kui Lee
The article Kui Lee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kui Lee for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:41, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kui Lee
The article Kui Lee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kui Lee for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Serpico
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Serpico you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas)
The article Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas)
The article Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

GOCE request
I've begun my first pass at copyediting the article Dog Day Afternoon. Please expect a ping on the article's talk page as I will most likely have questions. My process can be found here. — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 20:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Serpico
The article Serpico you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Serpico for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Dog Day Afternoon
Hello:

I'm not going to be doing any further work on Dog Day Afternoon. I was just fixing a few things that caught my eye. Best of luck with the GAN.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I was asking because I'm also at the time checking for details I may have overseen and such. I've seen one of my edits fall between two of yours, and I wanted to avoid some edit conflict (overwrite further copy-editing and such).-- GDuwen  Holler!  14:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Kui Lee
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Willie Nelson Statue
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Singing Brakeman (film)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Singing Brakeman (disambiguation)


The article The Singing Brakeman (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The singer is clear WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT, this page fails WP:ONEOTHER"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

(BTW, congrats on getting the film into DYK.) Narky Blert (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite
The article Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Further info: I will not pass this article for GA until it is copy edited at WP:GOCE. See the review for more info. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 07:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Serpico
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations
Your DYK hook about Serpico and its reverse sequencing drew 29,143 page views (1,214 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is the third most viewed hook so far during the month of February and has earned a place near the top of the Best of February list. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 08:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Nice to know, I'm guessing that having a picture of Al Pacino had probably a good deal to do with it!-- GDuwen <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 18:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Elvis Presley I Feel So Bad Single Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Elvis Presley I Feel So Bad Single Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doug Sahm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gene Taylor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dog Day Afternoon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dog Day Afternoon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Archiving
Hello, thanks for archiving talk pages. However, please name them like Talk:Hank Williams/Archive 4, not what you did with "Talk:Hank Williams/Archive3", and add a template like archive to the beginning of them so they are marked as archives. See Help:Archiving a talk page for more information ... or consider getting a bot to archive talk pages as described there. Graham 87 13:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Dog Day Afternoon

 * And thanks again for carefully reviewing the nomination. It is a lengthy article with plenty of citations and such. I'm happy enough that another great film has a decent coverage on its Wikipedia article!-- <b style="color:#E62020">GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 21:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dog Day Afternoon
The article Dog Day Afternoon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dog Day Afternoon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Blue Yodel No. 1 (T for Texas)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

There are several sentences that need clarification; I was uncertain of their meaning.

In the Rehearsal and concert section this sentence appears. He threw the cape into the first rows and then gave the audience the Shaka sign and received a golden crown from fans as he walked away.[47] What is a "golden crown"?

In the Reception section these sentences appear: Contrary to Parker's claim the concert would be presented with a delay of days or weeks to the 21 European countries where it was finally seen, countries that were a part of the Warsaw Treaty Organization were excluded.[7] The figures for total viewers proposed by Presley's manager were questioned,[8] as critics pointed that the sum of the total population of all the countries targeted by the broadcast was roughly 1.3 billion.[9] I'm assuming the 21 countries does not include Warsaw pact countries. If so it sounds like Parker originally thought they were included in which case this sentence needs clarification. The Warsaw pact country numbers need to be added to 21. The sentence with viewership numbers lacks the number of viewers Parker estimated so does not make sense as it stands.

The LA Times review sentence says ...while calling his antiques "an amusing parody" of his early career. Do they mean his performance of his older songs were a parody of what they were when he originally sang them?

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * First of, thanks for copy-editing the article. Your work is much appreciated.
 * Now for the clarifications:
 * Rehearsal and concert He was given by the fans a golden crown as he finished the concert, probably it was plastic or whatever. (as reflected on this news piece. I would add the newspaper in a citation. Because it's mentioned in the same breath as a hand signal it mislead me into thinking this was some new one I'd never heard of.
 * Reception: Let's break that down. It was supposed to be seen in 21 European countries. None of those countries were a part of the Warsaw treaty. About the viewership numbers, that refers to the live broadcast. Parker claimed during the press conference that it was supposed to be seen by 1.5 billion people. The Honolulu Star-Bulletin reflected the same numbers on their piece. But the books by Jerry Hopkins, Gaar Gillian and Matthias Haeussler make the case for Parker's nature to exaggerate numbers, and pointed to the fact that the sum of the population of the countries the concert was beamed at the time did not reach that number. Furthermore, Haeussler explains that the networks of Central Europe that received the footage aired it whenever they chose to. see below
 * LA Times review: that was also my reading, that the reviewer considered his performance a parody of Presley's former self. I'd use "performsance" rather than "antiques" then.
 * Hope that helps.-- <b style="color:#E62020">GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 19:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hope that helps.-- <b style="color:#E62020">GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 19:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

I would rephrase this paragraph then:

Suggest something like:Parker said the concert would be shown in 21 European countries but none that were part of the Warsaw Pact.[7] He estimated the viewership at 1.5 billion a number reflected by the Honolulu Star-Bulletine (add newspaper citation here). The figures for total viewers proposed by Presley's manager were questioned,[8] as critics pointed that the sum of the total population of all the countries targeted by the broadcast was roughly 1.3 billion.[9]


 * Well, the mention of the Warsaw Pact was not made by Parker himself, it was made by writer Matthias Haeussler, who clarified on his book Inventing Elvis: An American Icon in a Cold War World that the special was neither aired on the Eastern Bloc, nor on the Soviet Union. Parker made the mention of 21 countries. I'm positive the Star-Bulletin merely mirrored what Parker said during the press conference.-- <b style="color:#E62020">GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 20:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd leave it at Parker said the concert would be shown in 21 European countries. None that were part of the Warsaw Pact.[7] He estimated the viewership at 1.5 billion. The figures for total viewers proposed by Presley's manager were questioned,[8] as critics pointed that the sum of the total population of all the countries targeted by the broadcast was roughly 1.3 billion.[9]
 * Agree, that sounds well to me!-- <b style="color:#E62020">GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 20:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite
The article Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Dog Day Afternoon
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Doug Sahm
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Doug Sahm has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN when you get to it..

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking the time to copy-edit the article, much appreciated as usual!-- <b style="color:#E62020">GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 19:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Groover's Paradise
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations
Your DYK hook about Dog Day Afternoon drew 5,403 adjusted page views (439 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of March as shown at March 2021 DYK STATS. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 18:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Return of Wayne Douglas
~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 00:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Aloha from Hawaii via Satellite
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Return of Wayne Douglas - Doug Sahm.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Return of Wayne Douglas - Doug Sahm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Headed Stranger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bonaparte's Retreat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Kristofferson (album)
Thanks for copyediting, much appreciated!-- <b style="color:#E62020">GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 17:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries; good luck with your planned GA nomination. Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  02:42, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Stardust (1927 song)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Stardust (1927 song) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

One thing the article does not make crystal clear is that Carmichael was paid a salary to compose songs for Mills. I assume because of this he never received any kind of royalty payment for "Stardust". The article mentions it brought in $50,000 per year over a brief period. Do any of the sources mention how much the song has earned in total over the years? You might want to consider adding this in the Legacy section. Just a thought. Best of luck with the GAN when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


 * First, I want to thank you for your work copyediting. Now, about those royalties: According to this source, this other from TIME magazine or Carmichael's New York Times obituary he was receiving payments for the songs. I assumed that Mills music was keeping all of the earnings since he was one of their songwriters, but it seems that he at least got something. It apparently also produced one million dollars for Parish during his lifetime according to this source. I don't know if I'll be able to find the total earnings of the song, but I'll make sure to work this information into the article.-- <b style="color:#E62020">GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 18:56, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kristofferson (album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kristofferson (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 00:00, 1 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Please see at Talk:Kristofferson (album)/GA1 a preliminary review of one aspect of the nomination. Wasted Time R (talk) 09:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kristofferson (album)
The article Kristofferson (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kristofferson (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 16:20, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Elvis on Tour
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Elvis on Tour has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I did add as "Clarification Needed" tag to the end of the first paragraph of the Domestic critical reception. I'm assuming the Rolling Stone review dismissed the documentary as just another Elvis movie, but the text doesn't say that. As it stands, the meaning isn't clear.

Best of luck with the GAN when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your work once again. I don't know if you remember the information contained in all of the articles that you work on through the GOCE, but I can bet that there are few people around Wikipedia who learn about such a plethora of subjects. Other than that, I tried to clarify the Rolling Stone review. The writer meant that it was the first "real" Presley movie dismissing the content of all the others. IMO he does have some good movies, but around eighty percent are cheesy, lack of story or script, the lowest of the low budget (which like 90% of went to pay Elvis) or some downright cringe. You can understand why he wanted so bad out of that contract.-- <b style="color:#E62020">GD</b><b style="color:#273BE2">uwen</b> <b style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px; color:cyan"> Holler! </b> 20:18, 5 July 2021

(UTC)


 * You're welcome. You're right, I get to read some fascinating stuff. Col. Parker certainly didn't make out too badly from the 90% Elvis' got for his work! Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:00, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elvis on Tour
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elvis on Tour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elvis on Tour
The article Elvis on Tour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Elvis on Tour for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stardust (1927 song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stardust (1927 song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elvis on Tour
The article Elvis on Tour you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elvis on Tour for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:02, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doug Sahm
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doug Sahm you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doug Sahm
The article Doug Sahm you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Doug Sahm for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 01:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stardust (1927 song)
The article Stardust (1927 song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stardust (1927 song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:40, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Elvis on Tour
Hello! Your submission of Elvis on Tour at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 01:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kristofferson (album)
The article Kristofferson (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kristofferson (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stardust (1927 song)
The article Stardust (1927 song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stardust (1927 song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doug Sahm
The article Doug Sahm you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Doug Sahm for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 04:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Elvis on Tour
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Kristofferson (album)
—valereee (talk) 12:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Stardust (1927 song)
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Doug Sahm
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ode to Billie Joe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Demo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Legend The best of Willie Nelson.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Legend The best of Willie Nelson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Ode to Billie Joe
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ode to Billie Joe has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Good Hearted Woman by Waylon Jennings - 1972.ogg


The file File:Good Hearted Woman by Waylon Jennings - 1972.ogg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sample used as part of infobox of Good Hearted Woman (song). Insufficiently supported by critical commentary. May fail WP:NFCC. Even trimming out twelve seconds to comply with (limitations of) MOS:SAMPLE still wouldn't absolve issues with #8 criterion."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Willie Nelson and Merle Haggard - It&#39;s All Going to Pot.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Willie Nelson and Merle Haggard - It&, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)