User talk:GEAR4

MfD nomination of User:GEAR4
User:GEAR4, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GEAR4 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:GEAR4 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 16:54, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:GEAR4, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 17:14, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Please explain what I have done wrong by adding this information to the GEAR4 page? --GEAR4 (talk) 17:18, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * It is explained there: WP:UP. --Ben Ben (talk) 17:26, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I have removed the links and just left the company description. I'd like to create a GEAR4 page and description about what we do, could you help with how I can do this without it being deleted? --GEAR4 (talk) 17:37, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * An article from you about the subject would be considered as conflict of interests WP:CONFLICT, I think. WP:AVOIDCOI states you shouldn't do that. Wait untill someone else will write an article, based on Neutral point of view and predominantly Notability (organizations and companies). As a rule of thumb: what is in the yellow pages is not automatically notable for an ecyclopedia.--Ben Ben (talk) 17:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:GEAR4


A tag has been placed on User:GEAR4, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 18:08, 23 June 2011 (UTC)