User talk:GEORGIEGIBBONS

Welcome to my talk page where you can leave a message if you wish. Thanks for visiting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happy Birthday To You! (talk • contribs) 11:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

it improved it massively :) HappyBirthday2U 14:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happy Birthday To You! (talk • contribs)

Proposed deletion of Zilog head


The article Zilog head has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 14:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Zilog head
I have nominated Zilog head, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Zilog head. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. noq (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zilog head, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Do not delete other peoples opinion from an afd debate - this is considered vandalism. See '' noq (talk) 19:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 19:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. The next time you make a personal attack, as you did to User:Dancter at Articles for deletion/Dancter and Articles for deletion/Dancter/Archive 8, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. matt (talk) 20:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Please don't experiment with Articles for Deletion pages as you did with Articles for deletion/Zilog head. The AfD template belongs on the page that is being discussed, and not on the discussion page. --bonadea contributions talk 12:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk page deletion
Hi there. Unfortunately, user talk pages are only delete in exceptional cases; your main user page is another matter - you can request that it be deleted by putting at the top of that page. The template you put at the top of this page before is only used for Wikipedia articles. I suggest if you want to start over, that you simply blank this page and, well... start over. Failing that, you could always create a new account. Hope that helps! KaySL (talk) 12:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD notice removal
Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Zilog head, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Please do yourself a favour and stop trying to obstruct the due process of the article deletion process. Adding a template saying that the result of the discussion was to keep the article will not sway the community's decision in your favour. If you continue to obstruct and behave in this manner, you will be reported to an administrator. Thank you.'' KaySL (talk) 13:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

IGN
Did you get me banned from IGN coz I spoke about ass cheek hair —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mykee881211 (talk • contribs) 13:25, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD Notice
Would you care to explain why you placed an Articles for Deletion notice on Mykee881211's userpage? You are currently a subject in an ongoing sockpuppeting investigation, where you are accused of using the Mykee881211 account among others, to sockpuppet on Wikipedia. Your actions in having your userpage deleted, and now attempting to have Mykee881211's deleted also is only going to raise suspicions. May I also add that deleted pages can still be viewed by administrators, therefore nothing is hidden from the investigation. Thank you. KaySL (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

IGN
You're that guy who has been making them alts on IGN aren't you? RoboHomo (talk) 17:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

What the-
Why are you pretending to be me on a deletion discussion for your "zilog head" drama? I'm glad Clumsyorchid banned your IP for that. Sketch Style (talk) 19:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Armanijohnson (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

A question
Georgie, I would like, if you wish, to help you. You have a long and sorry history of sockpuppetry and vandalism here. Is this really what you want to do? Would you not truly, if given the opportunity, like to feel the rewards of being a productive editor here? As things are you create an account, you make a silly edit, you get blocked. Is there not more to life than this? Contact me. -- Anthony.bradbury "talk" 21:57, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

And an offer
Georgie, following your e-mail to me (which I have posted on my talk page), and after discussion with other experienced admins, I will propose to you a contract, based on the standard offer made in wikipedia in these type of circumstances. If you:-
 * Disclose the names of socks of yours, if any, which have not been discovered and blocked;
 * Undertake to create no more accounts for six months;
 * Promise in future to avoid the behaviour which led to your block and ban;
 * Do nothing to give any editor any reason to object to your return;

Then I will apply on your behalf for an unblock and an un-ban. I believe that under these conditions the community would allow it; I suspect that such a decision would be conditional on unbroken acceptable behaviour, which you have told me is your ambition.

I have allowed your access to this page to post your response. Do not disappoint me. -- Anthony.bradbury "talk" 16:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I'll answer here for now as I cannot edit my talk page due to the full protection.


 * I cannot think of any unblocked socks of mine, I think CU has already beaten them all or they have been blocked as ducks.
 * I agree to avoiding account creation for at least 6 months
 * I will avoid the behavior that led to my block and ban, which was vandalism and long term sockpuppetry.
 * I will not give any reason to any editor to object my return.

I will not disappoint you or any editor on Wikipedia.

Thank you for helping me out :)

Regards, Georgie