User talk:GFFan2

Red River Valley Women Today
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Red River Valley Women Today, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rrvwomentoday.com/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

The article Red River Valley Women Today has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * First, as I said above, the article is written in a promotional and non-neutral fashion (see WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM), with language like "its articles contain reliable and relevant subjects". Second, there's no indication that this local newspaper supplement is notable (WP:N) in that it has been recognized by reliable independent sources (WP:V).  I would suggest that this topic deserves maybe a sentence in the Grand Forks Herald article.  NawlinWiki (talk) 20:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)