User talk:GGreeneVa

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - CrazyRussian talk/email 06:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Orphaned fair use image (Image:LandisAt2006TourOfCalif.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:LandisAt2006TourOfCalif.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --  tariq abjotu  (joturner) 15:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

David Ben-Gurion on the Article Impovement Drive
Thanks for supporting David Ben-Gurion on the Article Creation and Improvement Drive. Repectfully, Republitarian 15:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Allen article
You just beat me to the delete of the so-called 'apology' by Allen concerning the Macaca incident. Richardjames444 20:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Allen reversion
Can you explain your reversion of my recent edit to the Allen article? Sdedeo (tips) 19:37, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Foley
Why would you cut, without commentary, the position of James Dobson, one of the 3 or 4 most influential conservatives and the chairman of the group covered in that section. I have raised the matter in Talk. It seems to me that we owe the man the decency of accurately reporting his position, if we are to cover him at all. If he wants to blame the matter on Clinton's penis, then that's his position. If he blames it on a joke, then that's his position. Both are also important parts of the emerging talking points. 150.203.2.85 16:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I suspected that might be your issue. So, I re-inerted without Clinton, though Dobson clearly emphasized Clinton. My issue is not with editing, you simply reverted the whole thing, giving Dobson no voice at all.


 * At a minimum, he called it a "joke". He was incredibly dismissive. The hypocricy does floor me, personally, but it's obviously a well-considered position having come out yesterday.


 * Frankly I'm not wild about having that section at all, but we should be fair to their positions if we do. I also think the press release is too extensively quoted. At any rate, thank you for your response. Cheers. 17:14, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Ian McKellan
You seem to be overlooking his knighthood of 1991. Best. --Moonraker88 16:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe
Actually, I believe you are incorrect that this the improper citation format. In fact, the complete name of the case, when abbreviated, would include the Inc. Nothing worth getting into a fight over. --Cdogsimmons 20:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Both Lexis and Westlaw include the Inc. in their citations as well as the Supreme Court's website where I got the information originally here, http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/casefinder/casefinder_1949-1970.html. (I was comparing the citations from Complete list of United States Supreme Court cases with the existing Supreme Court case articles and this case popped up. However, I've also found several places in my textbooks where the citation doesn't include the Inc. Anyway, I would say we've covered the problem.--Cdogsimmons 13:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The lady doth protest too much, methinks
You added this to my talk page: I am not an SLA. I am not a sock. I am an editor who reverted the article, and I defy you to identify who my sock puppets might be, or how you've sniffed out my mythical chicanery. Nobody accused you of being a sock. It was never even suggested as a possibility - all though I would bet $10,000 that SouthieFLA was some body's sock, but yours, I don't know, maybe, but this was never suggested. The fact that you would protest so strenuously about something that nobody even suggested may suggest a guilty conscience, it is certainly very peculiar. That you followed the discussion to the archives of my talk page is very strange. Your name wasn't mentioned. This is all very strange. I have no doubt that the IPs that the sockpuppetmaster used was a special untraceable one, but that it belonged to one of the 3 editors facing me is in no doubt, since the account was created after the edit war commenced.

I wasn't going to pursue this matter, but this had added some considerable intrigue for me. Hmmm. . . just by the by, in the light of your considerable interest in Greenwald (Greenvald in the old country). . are you by any chance related to Glenn GreeneVald, GGreeneVa with whom you appear to share a number of common interests, based on your edit history? David Spart ( talk · contribs · [ logs] · block user · [ block log] ) 02:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Southbound cars at san ysidro.jpg
File:Southbound cars at san ysidro.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Southbound cars at san ysidro.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 05:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)