User talk:GHI8765

July 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Human responsibilities, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 01:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moral responsibility ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 01:09, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Part of the problem is that you've offered no explanation for why you're changing the target of redirects like Irresponsibility. In the absence of an explanation, the changes appear disruptive. Please explain, here on your talk page, what you're trying to accomplish with the changes. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 01:14, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Irresponsible shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 01:17, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Bowei Huang 2 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 01:19, 26 July 2012 (UTC)