User talk:GHfan1975

List of fictional supercouples article, and other articles
Do not edit that article like this again. You falsified couples (using sources that were for other couples and falsely attributing them to couples you wanted on the list) and you removed sourced couples. If you continue to edit in this WP:Disruptive way, a WP:Block on your account will result. Flyer22 (talk) 01:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

The same goes for this, this, this, this, this and this; all of it either deceptive editing or plain WP:Disruptive editing. Flyer22 (talk) 01:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Once again, no biased editing. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Final warning: Regarding this, I believe you faked the "ABC Soaps in Depth" material, and, if it's the case that you did, this is your final warning about faking sources and disruptive editing in general. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

If you clicked on the links of the references I left, you would see that both additions were true. The ABC Soaps in Depth and the Soaps she Knows poll. I did copy and paste the links because I was not sure how to add it myself. May I add them back in now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GHfan1975 (talk • contribs)


 * You can re-add the poll, but, given your history of faking sources, I do not trust you on the "ABC Soaps in Depth" matter; I do not have a URL or the book for that.


 * On a side note: Remember to sign your posts on talk pages, using four tildes . Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, and here is the link for the ABC Soaps In Depth reference: Read it if you don't believe me. Jason and Sam are #75. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GHfan1975 (talk • contribs)


 * Okay, thank you for the link. Feel free to re-add both sources then. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Fixing a page
First off, how do I properly cite a source?

Second, I won't get in trouble if I fix a piece of information right? GHfan1975 (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)