User talk:GLChriss111/sandbox

Looks like you have a good direction. Do you have enough sources (does the original article provide you with enough leads to hunt down and explore further)? Looking forward to seeing your draft! Thea365Instructor (talk) 23:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Carol's Peer Review
The formatting of this lead section seems very clear and direct. I wonder if there are any reviews from media sources that can perhaps be included in this section.

I really enjoyed reading through specific information regarding Trey Anthony's 'Da Kink In My Hair. This particular section provided various factual details regarding its production history. One question that I had while reading the Wikipedia page was as follows: what are other aspects of her personal background that lead to her artistic visions or inspirations for the productions?

It was really interesting to read about her personal background in 2 different sections (Early Life and Personal Life) and it seems to provide a clear structure to the article as a whole. However, there are details like her brother, for instance, seems to be more suitable to be under Early Life. If there are more information that is going to be added to either of the sections, having a clear division may help enhance the structure and the presentation of the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carolleesw (talk • contribs) 18:18, 17 May 2018 (UTC)