User talk:GMRE

Welcome!

 * }

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte has been reverted. Your edit here to Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://strangevehicles.greyfalcon.us/mauspic/ratte100.jpg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:02, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:GMRE/KV-4 (tank) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KV-4 (tank), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. Petan-Bot (talk) 19:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 KV-4, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  01:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

KV-4
I've responded to your question here on my talk page. To add to what Bushranger said, while in Computer games (and the like) certain aircraft or vehicles mahave a high profile - these appearances are generally never significant enough to merit mention in the article about the vehicle. GraemeLeggett (talk) 17:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Civilization V: Brave New World
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Civilization V: Brave New World. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This is what a Civ V expansion article should look like: Civilization V: Gods & Kings. Not the collection of lists you keep inserting. This is an encyclopaedia not a gaming fan site. -Oosh (talk) 00:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)


 * My way is obviously infinitely superior in every way. GMRE (talk) 12:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Before Common Era / Before Christ
Hi GMRE,

As per WP:ERA I reckon we should stick with BCE in the article on Maya Devi Temple, Lumbini. See the talk page for discussion. Thanks. PhilMacD (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Broforce and Angry Joe
Re: So Angry Joe isn't a reliable source for what Angry Joe has said? In short, no. If the article was about AJ and you wanted a self-published source on what AJ said, it could work, but as secondary source commentary about Broforce (e.g., giving it a score), Angry Joe is not a reliable source since the source has not shown editorial oversight. Feel free to argue it further at WP:VG/RS if you'd like, but please revert your edit for now. In the future, when you disagree, editors typically bring the proposed edit to the article's talk page instead of reverting the first revert. czar ♔  19:35, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Rare combination lock with 4 dials.PNG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rare combination lock with 4 dials.PNG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Prototype
You had removed this entry under the consideration that it was "something that's already established by the opening sentence of the article": Prototype, any real object, system, business, etc. used as a basis for a model, especially in the hobby of model railroading My reason for adding the item is because (1) it is a fundamental term in modeling hobbies and (2) to my mind its meaning is not actually covered in the opening sentence and, in general, actually the opposite of the sense of the other entries. Perhaps you can help me make the entry reflect this important sense that is presently missing in the list with the link to the article. From eBay "A Model Railroader's Glossary of Common Terminology": Prototype - The actual subject upon which a model or replica is based. In engineering, etc, prototyping is the process of making models of something that will or might be made real, but in modeling hobbies, prototype is the "real thing" (sometimes referred to as 1:1 scale) that is being modeled. The real box car is referred to as the prototype of the model boxcar meant to represent; yes, the model boxcar is "something that is representative of a category of things", but within the hobby it is the "category of things represented" that is called the prototype, not thing (model) that represents them. The term is so fundamental you see it used in glossaries without definition, it is used in this sense without definition multiply in the linked article. Perhaps it is just a word twist I am hanging up on here, I may be wrong there, but I don't think so. In engineering, we make prototype models to represent something were are planning on making real version of, in software engineering, we make classes as prototypes for instances of objects; but in model railroading, I suppose the prototype trains are the models for the "real" model toys we make. But, in engineering, the design models we make of real things we call prototypes; but in model railroading, the models we make of real things we do not call prototypes. IveGoneAway (talk) 13:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC) 14:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * More to the point:


 * Engineering:  prototype is the model of the thing
 * Model hobbies: prototype is the thing being modeled
 * IveGoneAway (talk) 22:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I've also done some model building and I've never head someone use that word in this context. Also, the wording seemed suspicious. In this full explanation it makes much more sense. I'll put it back. GMRE (talk) 20:29, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)