User talk:GMoney0805

Welcome!
Hello, GMoney0805, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jonathunder (talk) 16:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

County State-Aid Highway 3 (Pennington County, Minnesota) and County State-Aid Highway 21 (Polk County, Minnesota)
Please stop removing the notability tag until the issue has been addressed. In short, as written and cited, neither article meets WP:GNG, the General Notability Guideline. Neither is the subject of "significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject". An article (or two) about a request for a speed limit survey is not sufficient to meet that bar.

Typically, we don't dedicate independent articles to county roads. There just isn't the level of sourcing out there on most county roads to allow us to write articles that will meed the GNG. Normally these roads would be covered as entries in a list. If an individual county road exceeds the bar set by GNG, like Brockway Mountain Drive, H-58 (Michigan county highway), or County Road 510 (Marquette County, Michigan), then we would write an article.  Imzadi 1979  →   18:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I created the CSAH 21 and CSAH 3 pages. It was my own work. I put a lot of time and effort into them, and used my own words no plagerism. If they are not satisfactory, I am sorry about that. I would prefer that something I put my time and effort into would not be butchered. The pages and data have been deleted. Thank you. GMoney0805 (talk) 19:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)GMoney0805GMoney0805 (talk) 19:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Nobody has accused you of plagiarism or said that your work sucked. All that's been said is that you have to prove why CSAH 3 and CSAH 21 are notable.  We'd rather not see your work be deleted; by merging everything into a list, we can be fairly certain that it won't. –Fredddie™ 22:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Honestly, it's alright, I'm not upset at all. I still have the "wiki codes" for both pages still saved on a document. CSAH 3 in Pennington County and CSAH 21 in Polk County are notable for they provide a link between Grand Forks, North Dakota/East Grand Forks, Minnesota area and the Thief River Falls, Minnesota area. I lived up there for two years, and know that route inside and out. Without it, there would not be an "almost direct link" between the two areas. There's a lot more to it, but too much to type on this talk page. I just wanted my two original pages deleted so everything could be correctly re-listed on a new page. I've already started compiling a list of county routes and their termini for a list. I failed to specify that, my apologies there. -GMoney0805 (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)GMoney0805GMoney0805 (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * once upon a time, Brockway Mountain Drive was nominated for deletion. (CSAH 3 and CSAH 21 have not been nominated for deletion, just had their notability questioned.) At the time, the article sucked. However, that nomination spurred some editors to improve the article to prove notability to stave off deletion. Later, more improvements were made, and now that article is a Featured Article, considered part of Wikipedia's finest work, an accolade that only around 0.1% of articles have achieved. I'm not saying that you need to improve CSAH3 and CSAH 21 to FA status; rather, you could invest a little more time researching the topics to find sources to prove the notability so that the articles meet our standards. That's all. Repeatedly removing a notice won't change the underlying facts though.  Imzadi 1979  →   23:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Sounds good to me. I do think that a county route list page for Pennington County makes more sense than just one page on one specific road. No worries, honestly am newish to Wikipedia, but once I gather a list together, I'll see what I can put together. Thanks I appreciate the honesty. GMoney0805 (talk) 23:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)GMoney0805GMoney0805 (talk) 23:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * How do you make those signs by the way? GMoney0805 (talk) 23:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)GMoney0805GMoney0805 (talk) 23:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:USRD/S/TUT has some tips. –Fredddie™ 00:13, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


 * thanks


 * You can take a look at List of county roads in Roseau County, Minnesota and List of county roads in St. Louis County, Minnesota for a couple of the ways county route lists are written. The latter would clearly work better for incorporating more detail in narrative prose - i.e. to merge in the articles you've written already - but a drawback is that it makes any lack of information on other roads more noticeable.
 * (Also: It's fine that you're changing the destinations in the junction lists to what appears on the signage, but you should note that in the edit summaries so anyone watching the article knows that's what you're doing. There didn't appear to be a reason for it, which is why I reverted.) --Sable232 (talk) 01:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


 * no worries your good completely understandable.
 * I appreciate the revisions on the list page. I was wondering if it would look like an eyesore haha.
 * Yeah it is officially signed. GMoney0805 (talk) 05:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)GMoney0805GMoney0805 (talk) 05:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GMoney0805 (talk • contribs) 02:22, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * You should remember to sign your posts. Otherwise linking to other users won't ping them. As for this truck bypass, that's not an official state/AASHTO designation. You've also been linking to it with  and appending   after the template. The result is that the "US 59" text is still linking to U.S. Route 59 in Minnesota, which is somewhat confusing because it's not part of the mainline of US 59. If it were an official state/AASHTO designation, you'd use   or , which would link to either U.S. Route 59 Truck (Thief River Falls, Minnesota) (Truck US 59) or U.S. Route 59 Bypass (Thief River Falls, Minnesota), respectively. Either of those links could be redirected to an appropriate article/article section. It appears that MnDOT has given the bypass a bit of sanction, but not much. I'd relegate any mention of it to the notes column and not try to list in the destinations column as if it were a fully official highway designation.  Imzadi 1979   →   03:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I will change that. Thanks for the heads up. GMoney0805 (talk) 05:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)GMoney0805GMoney0805 (talk) 05:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:County 65A square.svg


A tag has been placed on File:County 65A square.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Fredddie™ 23:38, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * hey on the Pennington County page I've been working on, is the broken image notification at the top from the 65A? GMoney0805

Proposed deletion of County roads in Cass County, North Dakota


The article County roads in Cass County, North Dakota has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unrefrenced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SSSB (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of you user page
Hi, I have nominated your user page as it is empty inline with WP:CSD G7 SSSB (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I've removed it as G7 does not apply to userpages. SSSB (talk) 21:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * My bad. 21:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSSB (talk • contribs)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 94 in North Dakota, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Williston and Wahpeton ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Interstate_94_in_North_Dakota check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Interstate_94_in_North_Dakota?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve County roads in Cass County, North Dakota
Hello, GMoney0805,

Thanks for creating County roads in Cass County, North Dakota! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minnesota State Highway 54, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elbow Lake, Minnesota ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Minnesota_State_Highway_54 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Minnesota_State_Highway_54?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of County State-Aid Highway 3 (Pennington County, Minnesota) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article County State-Aid Highway 3 (Pennington County, Minnesota) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/County State-Aid Highway 3 (Pennington County, Minnesota) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Imzadi 1979  →   20:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of County State-Aid Highway 21 (Polk County, Minnesota) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article County State-Aid Highway 21 (Polk County, Minnesota) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/County State-Aid Highway 21 (Polk County, Minnesota) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Imzadi 1979  →   21:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

I-675 speed limit
The article on I-675 is a Featured Article. As such, we should be trying to maintain it as an example of "Wikipedia's finest work".

I removed your addition of the speed limit the first time a few weeks ago because it wasn't cited.

Earlier today, you added that detail back and attempted to use Google Maps satellite imagery to support it. That doesn't work, so you're really back to the situation as before: adding uncited material to a Featured Article.

Beyond all that, I don't see that detail as needed in the article. If it was, it would have been added during the various review processes.  Imzadi 1979  →   03:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)