User talk:GN Dhinesh Kumar

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarojads Wikipedia


A tag has been placed on Sarojads Wikipedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 09:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saroj Ads
Hello GN Dhinesh Kumar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saroj Ads for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  Ish dar  ian  10:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Peridon (talk) 11:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It does happen that people who work in advertising cannot see that things they write look promotional because they are writing like that all the time. Please read WP:CORP about corporate notability, and WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove it. Also read WP:COI about editing subjects you are close to. Note that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and not a directory, and not every company or person gets an article here. Peridon (talk) 11:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)