User talk:GPSirkali

June 2021
Hello, I'm Sdrqaz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sirkazhi G. Sivachidambaram have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Sirkazhi G. Sivachidambaram, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:GPSirkali, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/GPSirkali. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)