User talk:GRANDK5

29 March 2006

 * 1) Please do not remove speedy deletion tags on articles for which you are the creator, doing so is considered vandalism and can lead to a temporary or permant block. Please do not create alternate accounts to try and circumvent this policy. These alternate accounts are called sock puppets and are specifically prohibited, see WP:SOCK for more info. Again, if you object to the deletion, please explain your rational on the article's talk page so that an administrator can take this into account. --Hetar 04:30, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
I have proposed Lenin Lora for deletion; if you think the article should be kept, please respond via the article's talk page (and perhaps add some more content to the page, if this person is in fact notable.) --Brianyoumans 16:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello GRANDK5! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Luis Segura -

Proposed deletion of Gonzalo Lora


The article Gonzalo Lora has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP. Not much of a claim to notability here, and no significant coverage found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 07:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Carmen Ordóñez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carmen Ordóñez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Carmen Ordóñez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)