User talk:GRyaRya

Welcome!

Hello, GRyaRya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cenzo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Terrillja talk  18:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Cenzo
A tag has been placed on Cenzo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja talk  18:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Cenzo has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i0zVRHMxgA. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:45, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Cenzo do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i0zVRHMxgA. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Nasnema  Chat  00:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Conrad Lant with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geoff Who, me?  00:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. --John of Lancaster (talk) 17:06, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Multiple accounts
Hi GRyaRya. I have noticed a very similar pattern in your edits and that of this IP user. You may be unconnected, but if you are the same person you should read carefully the advice at WP:SOC or ask for further advice from an established editor or admin, as using two accounts to edit the same articles might be taken as sockpuppetry, which is not allowed on Wikipedia.--''' SabreBD  (talk ) 17:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to All hope is gone, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. ''' SabreBD  (talk ) 17:45, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Oldschool jungle
Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Oldschool jungle. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You need to add references to your recent contribution to said article. Lighthead (talk) 21:23, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at All Hope Is Gone (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''' SabreBD  (talk ) 06:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Genre disruptions
A key note to tie along with the rest of your disruptions over this website; I would like to say when it says "DO NOT ADD OR CHANGE GENRES" then DO NOT do it such as what went on at the Killswitch Engage article. And furthermore; NWOAHM (New Wave of American Heavy Metal) is not a genre, it is a movement. The least you can do is actually know what you're even saying before you disrupt. • GunMetal Angel  22:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * On a similar note, please obey the message that says "Do NOT ADD/CHANGE GENRES BEFORE DISCUSSING ON TALK PAGE", it means you shouldn't do it. A consensus has already has been made on the Slipknot and All Hope Is Gone talk pages. We find this very irritating and disruptive. Thank you.  Kevon100    Talk! If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻ 02:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * And again: about your genre change on Slipknot, it clearly states: Please do not edit anything within this section otherwise your edit will be reverted, the consensus of Slipknot's genre has been fully reached. Since you've been warned before, why persist this behaviour? — Quibus (talk) 06:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Battle Rap
Hello. I just reverted your edit to Battle rap, and I wanted to explain why. I couldn't find a reliable source to verify the content. You requested that people look at In the Car Entertainment's page before editing. In the Car Entertainment doesn't have an article (and based on my search, shouldn't for the time being), so I assume that you meant their Facebook page. That doesn't count as a reliable source. What we need is a published, third party source, such as a newspaper article. Besides that, the Facebook page even describes it as "developing small". When it takes off and receives outside coverage, it might merit inclusion, but not now. Sorry. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints / Mistakes  05:04, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

"debated" emo genre for My Chemical Romance
Hi. Just thought I'd let you know why I removed your addition of "(debated)" next to the genre "emo" in the infobox on the My Chemical Romance article. While it is true that there is some controversy over the band being "emo" (although for the most part it seems like the members of the band just don't like the negative connotations that come with being labelled "emo"...wah wah poor them), the genre itself is still reliably sourced in the "Musical style and influences" section, and thus applies to the band. Claiming in the infobox that it is "debated" makes it seem like this information may not belong in the infobox, which is untrue. The article's Table of Contents is clearly visible and has direct links to the "Controversy and 'emo' label" section of the article, where a reader could easily go to read that there is controversy regarding the genre. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 20:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

unsourced additions
please stop adding unsourced entries as you did to list of black metal bands l-zCurb Chain (talk) 10:02, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Horrorcore. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)