User talk:GS1905

Galatasaray
Sorry I did not reply earlier, I was... sleeping. We have a time difference here. I have protected the article. I will not block the IP because it has changed a couple of times already, and blocking dynamic IPs for WP:3RR violation is rather meaningless. As for the other user, he is quite new and is most probably not aware of WP:3RR. Though he is also new, the reason why I did block User:Waya 5 was because he not only violated this rule but used inflamatory edit summaries. Anyway, I have protected the article until something is sorted out to stop this edit warring.--Konstable 20:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * All this technobabble doesn't make sense. I still want to know why my fellow user is still blocked but this anonymous user with his many IP's and user names is still allowed to vandalize and revert many other articles. And the other is not banned because he did not realize?  Maybe Waya 5 did not realize?!  How about unbanning him?  He was not aware?!  How can you not take action?  Do you have ties with the English user? You both appear interested in computer science and you have done a lot of travelling apparently. I realize you may not know much about the Galatasaray but we have people messing around with painstakingly assorted facts and statistics. Regarding civility, the anonymous user told Waya5 to go to sleep and never wake up.  That isn't inflammatory?  The English user had the nerve to say "learn some humility" while he was adding false information?  What is that about?  I still cannot believe you banned Waya 5 without consideration and are leaving these other two alone.--GS1905 20:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * WP:3RR is "The Three Revert Rule" - it means if you revert the page more than 4 times in 24 hours you will get blocked, with a few exceptions for things like vandalism. The other two cannot edit the article right now either.  Again, I cannot block an anon user on dynmaic IPs for a 3RR violation because this will achieve absolutely nothing - the IP will just change again.  Again, the reason why I blocked Waya 5 and not Chappy84 was because Waya 5 made comments like: "You two were made for eachother" and called people "idiots" in his edit summaries.  Waya's block is not too long so I suggest you just focus on fixing the dispute in the article rather than trying to get more users blocked - which would only delay discussion and mean the article stays protected for longer.--Konstable 21:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)