User talk:GSS/Archive 12

Antonio Merlo
I'm seeking an explanation for the below flags--the [|page] has several contributors and the initial posting was done by a collection of Rice students posting under a single name (Cassiopeia) and operating independently of the dean. In addition, it's not clear how what number of "additional citations" would suffice. Any clarification would be helpful. Thank you for your time.

A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (August 2018) This article is an autobiography or has been extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject. (March 2021) This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. (March 2021) Jmdevitt24 (talk) 19:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Kostka Bojana
Dear GSS,

Hello. I am writing to you regarding my article "Kostka Bojana" that you have declined because of not enough sources. I have updated the article with more references from reliable sources. I have even sent a message to you on couple occasions because at this point I dont know what I am doing wrong. As this same article is published and live on Serbian Wikipedia. So this is the translation of the article that has been approved. I am asking you kindly to assist me. Looking forward to hearing from you. Kind regards, Dusan Rajic (talk) 16:58, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Dusan Rajic

You've got mail

 * Thank you so much for sharing the details. You made my day :) I guess must also see. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Just wondering how it's related to them? :D --Firestar464 (talk) 05:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * see their names in the post as my socks lmfao. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I see. Remember to submit it via email. --Firestar464 (talk) 05:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You can share the link with them privately or if you want I can forward your email. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I am really intrigued now . --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * please check your inbox. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 11:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wow, that was not what I was expecting. . --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Too busy I guess?
I haven’t been seeing you frequently on my watchlist compared to a 6 months ago so I decided to pay you a visit today, I hope real life isn’t being too stressful on you. Do ensure Stay safe always mate. Celestina007 (talk) 00:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

How to Submit a Draft
You are stopping me to submit a Wiki Draft for review with other Wiki editors, May i know Why? And what else i need to do to submit the draft.Randfiskin (talk)
 * See my reply on your talk page. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 16:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Johnshade2
Hi. In the edit history of Rosamond Bernier, you make a claim of UPE, and say that there is off-wiki evidence. They have moved the draft back into mainspace. The tone of the article does suggest COI, but would you care to share your evidence, as long as it doesn't involve WP:OUTING? Thanks.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Inquiry SFA & More
Hi - Following up to check in if you had any additional questions on our agency's approach to revising edits for SFA. Friendly reminder, I'm just not sure what I should do so I apologize if I got anything wrong. There's additional edit requests I'd like to make so I want to make sure all is cleared to not violate any wiki guidelines.

LeannaTruong (talk) 16:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

What is your problem
Why you've marked my article Apna Nawada for deletion ? Sumanrsb2 (talk) 13:20, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Please see it
Hello, I have contributed to Draft:Emiway which I got already made. Some of the sources in this were not reliable which was preventing the article from being published, which I have removed. Most of the sources were in discography and I think discography does not matter much source. Therefore, I will ask you to review it. Regards — 223.238.206.175 (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Karthika Adaikalam
Back in July 2018 you proposed deletion of Karthika Adaikalam. The article was deleted, but I have now restored it in response to a request to do so at WP:Requests for undeletion. JBW (talk) 14:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Which of the sources you did not find reliable?
This is regarding your recent revert of my edit on Avneet Kaur's page. You stated that my sources were not reliable so I wanted to ask you that from those mentioned sources which one did you find unreliable? as you directly removed all the information with citations and I do stand for my fact that not all of them were unreliable. Kindly go through the mentioned reference links and let me know which of these are unreliable, so that I could add the rest of the source links again. Thanks! Manalijain (talk) 06:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Almost all you listed above. Please see WP:RS and WP:QUESTIONABLE. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 07:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Request on 17:03:42, 7 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Mannitish
RD Sharma is most prominent mathematics writer in Indian there are whole articles on him, still rejection reason given that only passing information. I believe TRD Sharma profile should get approval.

Mannitish (talk) 17:03, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello :

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is currently a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello ,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our  Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but  there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software. Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Neha Disussion
Hi GSS, Sorry if that irritates you. I was discussing it just because I felt like it was passing WP:basic. Rest, its all right, if other editors don't think in the same way, I have no issue and I am accepting it. Please feel free to close the discussion as delete, non admin closure. Sonofstar (talk) 05:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Mail Notice
Celestina007 (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Boo!


Happy Halloween!

Hello : Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween! —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 21:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Kamala Beach
Hi. Could you please specify what the COI concerns are that necessitated the page's draftification, as I enquired on the talk page? The topic is about a geographical location, so some clarification would be needed in order to properly review the issue. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas 2021


 "And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,   I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.  For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."  Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version) 

CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC) is wishing you a Merry Christmas. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest. Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
 * The template db-afc-move has been created - this template is similar to db-move when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022
Hello ,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently Special:ListUsers/patroller New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022
Hello ,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.
 * Backlog status

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.
 * Backlog drive

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
 * TIP – New school articles

There is a new template available,, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
 * Misc

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.


 * Reminders
 * Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
 * If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing on their talk page.
 * If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
 * To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
 * Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!
(t &#183; c)  buidhe  20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022
Hello ,

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators and, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
 * Backlog status

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.


 * Coordination: and  have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out.  will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.


 * Open letter to the WMF: The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.


 * TIP - Reviewing by subject: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.


 * New reviewers: The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.


 * Reminders
 * Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
 * If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing on their talk page.
 * If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
 * To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message
Hi ,

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.
 * Invitation

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive
(t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022
Hello , Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to ), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also. Software news: and  have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved. Suggestions:
 * There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
 * Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
 * Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
 * This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog: Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!


 * Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Happy Holidays text.png Hello GSS: Enjoy the holiday season&#32;and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:44, 23 December 2022 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:44, 23 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

You have been pruned from the WikiProject India/Members list.
Hi GSS! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at WikiProject India/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting WikiProject India/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello GSS! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello , The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by using  at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter
Hello ,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive
 Hello GSS:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Dhuleta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhuleta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dhuleta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 09:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Satoshi Utsunomiya
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Satoshi Utsunomiya. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 13:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Lion of Oz
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Lion of Oz. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 06:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Chikki Panday
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Chikki Panday. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Owen&times; &#9742;  18:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Deanne Pandey
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Deanne Pandey. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Owen&times; &#9742;  18:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Concerns about GSS. Thank you. Vickyfoxx (talk) 13:54, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello GSS
I think Draft:Aadish Jain, have the sufficient references it would be a great help that you approve that thank you Ipsaindore (talk) 14:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The sources used do not meet WP:RS. I suggest citing reputable third-party sources that directly discuss the subject in detail. Please revise the draft accordingly and resubmit it for review. Thank you. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 14:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I kindly seek assistance in ensuring the approval of the page. Your guidance and support in this matter are greatly appreciated. I eagerly await your feedback and approval. Thank you. Ipsaindore (talk) 14:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please take a moment to review the guidelines outlined in WP:GNG and WP:N to familiarize yourself with the notability criteria. If you require further assistance, you can visit WP:TEAHOUSE. I can only help you with fixing issues or errors on the page. Thank you. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 15:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Christopher Ononukwe
Thank you for reviewing my draft article Draft: Christopher Ononukwe despite your tight schedule. I appreciate your efforts, time and resourcefulness. Unfortunately, the reason for the rejection which you gave does not seem to align with what the subject actually represents because most of the third-party, independent and reliable sources (e.g. sources 3,4,6,7,8, and 9) cited adequately treats Draft: Christopher Ononukwe, not just mentioning it in the passing as claimed. I will be glad if you could reconsider your stance and approve the submission. Thank you. Nwachinazo1 (talk) 17:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The sources provided don't establish notability. They're either not reliable or only briefly mention the subject. Please include references from reliable sources that thoroughly discuss the subject. Once you've done that, you can submit it again for review by someone else. Thank you. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 18:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your response. However, the sources cited are reliable, even though few of them are local newspapers without an online presence. Again, I have added more third-party, independent and reliable sources to strengthen the subject's notability. Most of the references cited thoroughly discuss the subject. Your claim that sources cited are not reliable or merely discuss the subject briefly are unfair because you didn't adequate review the content of those sources provided but hurriedly did so. I appeal that you reconsider your stance concerning those online sources that treat and cover the subject sufficiently to establish his notability. Thank you. Nwachinazo1 (talk) 15:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * As I have previously reviewed the page, I will leave it to another reviewer to reevaluate the draft. Thank you for your cooperation. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 15:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay. I still believe you can review the draft in line with fresh references added and the explanations I have offered regarding your previous review. However, you may wish to leave it for another reviewer if you are too busy. Yet your opinion is likely to affect the review by others. I think you can assist me to strengthen the draft, giving the conviction that I have about the subject's notability. Nwachinazo1 (talk) 21:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol
Hello GSS! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Welcome back
It must have been. I see that you went inactive around the same time I stopped being active so much. It was not a big deal at all; I just said it to show I had a specific memory of you, cos our actual direct interaction was likely close to zero. I am happy to see you back. Regards!<span id="Usedtobecool:1708750250361:User_talkFTTCLNGSS" class="FTTCmt"> — Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I appreciate you sharing your memory, and I'm glad to be back and active again. If there's anything you'd like to catch up on or discuss, feel free to reach out. Thank you for your message and the warm welcome back. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am sure we will have opportunity to work together to protect the encyclopedia. I look forward to it. Best,<span id="Usedtobecool:1708779544376:User_talkFTTCLNGSS" class="FTTCmt"> — Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Aran World
Hello, thank you so much for reviewing Draft: Aran World. As I'm starting with wikipedia i made sure to have reliable sources such as Phd thesis, MSc thesis and only 1st layer Newspapers and Magazine. All the sources seem to be reliable and threat the topic from a neutral standpoint, but I understand there may be something that's causing the declination. Could you point it out? I'll review that cause at the moment I'm not clear where the problem is Genk24 (talk) 18:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The sources you referenced in the draft do not meet the criteria outlined in WP:NCORP. They only provide brief mentions. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Of course I wanted to make the content the best it could being in Wikipedia, so added many sources. Do you suggest limiting the number of sources, it's a lot despite being a short description so far. On top of that, I removed one reference and substitute with university these could you have a look? Genk24 (talk) 07:53, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi GSS. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
 * Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Bhim Singh (Bihar politician) comments
Thank you for commenting your views on this draft. In response, this politician is a low-importance Bihar politician. The detail of his education and career is based on his profile at his official govt website (prior to state legislator). I can't guarantee you that this one has more reliable coverage about his education profile but I assured you that I exempted most of the info per WP:NPOV at the govt website and added the political post he assumed prior to his state legislator. CSMention269 (talk) 16:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you're unable to locate any third-party sources, it would be advisable to temporarily remove the unsourced information, then add it back once there are sources for verification. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 16:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Request for help to make sure draft is approved
Hi GSS, Can you please explain on what needs to be added/modified to make this draft workable for resubmitting?

As of now, at least one of the sources did not meet the criteria (in-depth, reliable, secondary, strictly independent of the subject), but I don't know which one(s) that might be. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:PetPair DanielMiyares (talk) 20:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, please see my comment on the draft. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed page on songwriter Rob Milton
Thank you for your feedback on my draft page. I have now added a number of additional references which I think brings this up to the standard of many other published pages on other UK songwriters. Have re-submitted for consideration. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.254.224.38 (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival
What do you know about this article ? that you are assuming deletion and putting note to deleting admin? This article has nothing to do with previously created half baked misinformed ones.Fostera12 (talk) 14:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, it's not within your purview to make this decision, so that should be left to an admin to decide. I can see that you are engaging in an edit war with multiple users by reverting their edits, so please refrain from doing so. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 14:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Your email
Hi, GSS! Thanks for your email, I'd completely missed that aspect. I see that you've added a note about it to the SPI, so plan to leave it to bigger brains than mine to establish whether there's a provable connection. Anyway, thanks and regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * You're welcome! It's valuable to consider multiple perspectives on such matters. I had overlooked this interesting edit on simple-wiki earlier. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Concerns regarding draftifying Connor Dean
Hello @GSS! I reached out regarding Connor Dean, which was earlier moved to draftspace due to lack of resources however many other sources were added to the article and yet it was again moved to draftspace there are many pages on Wikipedia that may not even have 2 or 3 sources yet they are in mainspace however this page despite having many sources is getting moved to draftspace, all the available sources are already added to the article. Thank you Supercat9906 (talk) 09:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message. The provided sources lack reliability and fail to establish the subject's notability, hence the move to draft namespace. Please see WP:RS to understand what kind of sources are considered "reliable." <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 10:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi GSS, It shouldn't be moved into draftspace twice because draftspace isn't intended as a backdoor route to deletion. Typically, a page should only be moved to draftspace once, unless there are UPE/COI issues involved. If the author objects by moving it back into mainspace, it's no longer considered an uncontroversial move. In such cases, the page needs to be handled through other processes such as deletion, stubbing, tagging, and so on. I hope this helps. – <b style="color:black; font-family: Tahoma">DreamRimmer</b> (talk) 10:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The page was moved per WP:DRAFTIFY #1 and #2, aiming to see better sources as the subject claims involvement in significant productions. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 10:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * AfC is optional, and it should not have been draftified twice per WP:DRAFTOBJECT. – <b style="color:black; font-family: Tahoma">DreamRimmer</b> (talk) 11:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I regularly fix these types of drafts, and when I saw it, I thought I should send you a friendly reminder. – <b style="color:black; font-family: Tahoma">DreamRimmer</b> (talk) 11:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Why didn't you mentioned the deputy chief ministers who served in YS Jagan ministry ? need an explanation on this
Please respond Vara Naveen Reddy (talk) 10:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

UPE Sock farm
User:Dwaipayangreenreef -- This is a weird case but it's all connected through one set of UPE articles that have the same image from the original article and also mostly the same text. (I've deleted the remaining version of it, linked from an article created by one of the suspected socks I blocked today). I've only scratched the surface, there's probably a lot more stuff that I haven't seen, care to take a look? Two of the accounts I blocked haven't edited in years but the link is there. I'm not entirely sure but it could possibly be linked to another UPE farm I blocked 4-5 years ago -- Sandiprajbhar. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Certainly! Count me in for checking it out further. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 13:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You are right, this one is complicated and seems to be a major UPE sockfarm. Take a look at this one. I stumbled upon it while investigating a recreation of the same article by Wikieditorhans1 under a slightly different title. It appears to be intriguing. Additionally, there are two more accounts that seem connected, but they haven't edited for a long time. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 14:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I think they are creating a couple of accounts every time and then stopping usage once problems are found. I'll take a look at the deleted articles later to check deeper. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Indeed, I've observed similar behavior from other users. When asked to disclose their involvement in paid editing, they simply cease editing and switch to another account. Please check your inbox for an interesting case that I encountered a few weeks ago. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 07:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

User:SpacemanSpiff, for your enjoyment, I confirmed User:Lazzy Crazzy with User:Amandanike and User:Paniram. Drmies (talk) 16:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * And those are confirmed with User talk:Arnoldwera, User talk:Amanda5689, User talk:Offisapup, User talk:EstateOptionINDIA, User talk:Ajayrajuactor, User talk:Saralockkk, User talk:Kumaresh2498, User talk:Dalvir navnitgroup, User talk:Hermanarnold2, User talk:Mankishalberto. Spiff, there's a few older accounts in there and I will email you those names--these may be the masterminds, they may be completely innocent, but they are perfect CU matches and I will leave the decision up to you. I forgot to mention that the entire range is just full of spammers, some of really low quality, and I didn't tag them all as CU-blocks or mention them here. The ones here are, I think, pretty likely to belong to your farm, given their names and articles. Maybe not that EstateOption one and the Navit group but hey, they are confirmed. Drmies (talk) 16:43, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail!
Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for your review. My article on Henry Braun was declined primarily because "they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". But I have pointed to secondary sources like National Academy of Education, National Academy of Arts and Sciences, and New Meridian that do not just make passing mention, but has Henry Braun's full bio. I also included independent sources (like "American Statistical Association Fellows list" and "Complete list of fellows of American Educational Research Association") to prove Henry's fellow statuses and awards. So, pretty much everything I wrote about him can be verified from other sources some of whom seem to give significant coverage. Would you please point to any flaw in my argument? Or would you please let me know if you consider sources like National Academy of Education and National Academy of Arts and Sciences to be unimportant? Thanks Seeking Absolute Truth  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seeking absolute truth (talk • contribs) 21:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Medical Translations
Nice to see you using the medical translation dashboard. Thanks for your contributions. Lucas559 (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, GSS. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hi,

I noticed you have just rolled back all my edits on Sam Pepper, may I ask why?

There was a magnitude of sources included in my edits.

Regards

Triplefour (talk) 09:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


 * For example, the infobox edits should not of been reversed, as they are objectively true, all that was edited was updated analytics using sources previously accepted for metrics. Triplefour (talk) 10:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The sites you used, such as YouTube and Twitter, aren't considered reliable. Please refer to WP:RS for better understanding on citing sources. For the updates in the infobox, you still need to provide reliable sources to support your changes. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 10:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * This is invalid, the Twitter source was a link to the statement made by the company, as it was a statement on Twitter, so how is this not reliable.
 * YouTube sources are direct evidence of the travels undertaken, direct primary evidence.
 * If the YouTube sources are not valid, simply remove those. Why the need to undo all edits? There was 1 or 2 sentences added that use YouTube refs
 * Triplefour (talk) 10:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Eyes
Definitely not a new user. CNMall41 (talk) 07:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Haha. Actually, I found it. Related to another SPI. Will file tomorrow when I have more time. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That's great, let me know if I can help you with anything. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 09:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You were pinged. Cheers! --CNMall41 (talk) 18:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Noblie.eu Ref link
Hi, how is that spam link? And about COI I’ve already disclosed in the summary, more to that I’ve removed the dead/broken link and added informative link from Noblie, care to explain? HarryD (talk) 10:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * FYI, that's a commercial website selling knives, and such links are not allowed. Please refrain from spamming. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 10:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you! <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 04:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Banner removal reverted
Hello, you just reverted the removal of multiple issues banner on Sanki King when those issues seem to have been already resolved years ago on the talk pages of the article and of SameStruggle. A similar banner was posted which was then removed after lengthy discussions, all present on the talk pages. What is the point of keeping the same banner posted? Thanks Maxdorx (talk) 10:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Could you please disclose any potential conflict of interest (COI) you may have per WP:COI? It's quite surprising that you registered today and are suggesting the removal of maintenance tags from an article that was created by an undisclosed paid editor. As for the tags, they should remain as the article still requires significant cleanup to adhere to WP:NPOV. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 10:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I am simply going through the articles of all the top Pakistani artists and doing cleanup, expansion, with what little knowledge I have of Wiki. What does the registration date has to do with anything? I read these articles before registering, all of them have several issues and talk pages have the history behind the issues.
 * Surprised by your response because in the talk history of User:SameStruggle you are the one who brought up the paid editing issue in '19 and it seems that the user is the artist Sanki King himself who took a single paid editing job not for his own article but something else. SameStruggle has admitted on both talk pages that he is the artist himself and intends to not edit the article again and hasn't since. You are also tagged in the latest message from Sep 2023 on the article's talk page by the artist himself, seeking assistance for cleanup and expansion with new links. So there were no banners on the article post Sept 2023, 3 different editors cleaned up the article since 2019 but now suddenly there are multiple issues with the article, issues that have already been resolved? Please explain that. Maxdorx (talk) 11:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, It's not uncommon for undisclosed paid editors to pose as someone else or their client and then have the client confirm it, so I'm skeptical of this claim. The subject of the article has a history of hiring paid editors, and since the last attempt to remove the tag, no major neutral editor has cleaned the page. It appears to have been heavily edited by its creator. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 13:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I understand. I will do the cleanup and expansion and have pinged a senior editor on the article's talk page as well, been looking for art editors through the edit history of articles of renowned artists and found him on Damien Hirst's history. Will look for more senior editors to bring their attention to articles of important Pakistani artists that need cleanup and expansion, their guidance and inputs will be very helpful. Maxdorx (talk) 02:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You have added a new tag to the banner of "unreliable sources", kindly point out those sources so they can be removed. Maxdorx (talk) 08:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi GSS, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:


 * Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
 * If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
 * If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)