User talk:GUHAN MENON

March 2021
Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dulquer Salmaan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Do not change sourced DOB. It is also a GA status article. Discuss your issues in the talk page first if necessary. WP:BRD.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

https://m3db.com/dulqar-salman GUHAN MENON (talk) 05:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dulquer Salmaan. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:23, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dulquer Salmaan was changed by GUHAN MENON (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957588 on 2021-03-25T05:23:27+00:00

https://m3db.com/dulqar-salman is not a reliable source. You better discuss in Talk:Dulquer Salmaan as per WP:BRD with a WP:RS, WP:ICTFFAQ complaint source like Times of India, The Hindu, any mainstream newspaper, magazine, etc. Do not edit war. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

June 21
.Slatersteven (talk) 15:16, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

ALso please read wp:minor, a minor edit should not change any meaning.Slatersteven (talk) 15:17, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

I also suggest you read wp:editwar, whilst you have not breached 3rr, you have been making the same changes over a number of weeks. This can also be judged as a vilation of edit war.Slatersteven (talk) 15:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm RegentsPark. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Violence against Muslims in India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. RegentsPark (comment) 15:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Dulquer Salmaan.   -- DaxServer (talk) 16:07, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Aniyan Bava Chetan Bava, you may be blocked from editing.   -- DaxServer (talk) 16:18, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Violence against Muslims in India
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 10:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Read wp:editwar very carefully, it does not have to breach 3RR, you have been reverted make a case.Slatersteven (talk) 09:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at British Raj, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   -- DaxServer (talk) 07:58, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. RegentsPark (comment) 15:58, 2 July 2021 (UTC)