User talk:GVR117/United States abortion-rights movement

Everything in the article seemed to be relevant to me! It seems that the democratic side is more represented, but it still remains fairly neutral. The citations are working and active, well support the article and its claims, and seem to be appropriate and balanced. However, it seems that the majority of the sources are more than 10 years old. But it appears that the most recent ones that you have added have been more recent, so that is great! Maybe see if there are some more recent articles that you could reference as well? Based on your editing history, it looks like you guys are up to a lot of good work!Debat012 (talk) 20:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review
All of the information in the article seems very relevant. I like that you use facts about the subject that aren't biased. All of the sources seem good as well, but I think it would be beneficial to use some that are from more recent years. Is this movement just discussing the abortion rights of women, or does it include people of other genders? If it is not specifically referring to women, maybe consider using gender neutral pronouns like they/them/theirs when writing. Additionally, if it is not specifically for women, consider researching the effects of abortion on trans and non-binary individuals (or anyone who has the ability to become pregnant). Overall, this is a very good an informative article! Will5590 (talk) 05:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for these peer reviews. It was difficult to find recent sources there is why they are only a few. We will try to find broader information for people who can get pregnant and do not identify as women.