User talk:GWA88

Wall Street Journal
Hi. The Wall Street Journal is effectively subscriber-only. Get some 'free' articles but not for a month like other media, it's for a much longer time. Haven't been able to read WSJ since late August. Don't have idea when (or if, unlikely) they'll let me in again. Anyway, added second reference to Turkey story. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 19:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

2016 Nevada wildfire
Once a speedy deletion tag is placed on an article such as 2016 Nevada wildfire, it should not be replaced. Instead, WP:PROD or WP:AFD may be used to discuss the article further. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

List of California wildfires & Bluecut Fire
Heyo! Thanks for adding the Bluecut Fire to the list. I made one change to your addition. I trimmed down the notes dramatically. While I do feel that what you added is of great significance, I feel strongly that it belongs on the article page for the fire itself, not in the notes field. At the moment a "unknown number of structures have been destroyed" according to InciWeb. Once they (or someone else) release good solid number, that should absolutely be included in the table. But specific structures I don't think should go in the list. Otherwise that table is going to blow up! Does that make sense? Let me know your thoughts. Keep up the great work! -- Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Possible copyright violation(s)
Your contributions are appreciated. You are very welcome here. However, I have encountered possible copyright violation(s). Some or all of the content you added in a recent edit to 2016 clown sightings in this edit(s) appears to have been copy pasted from this source and has been removed.

Please remember that you must write in your own words. We cannot copy and paste from other websites. If I have made an error, please accept my apologies.

For further information, please read Copyright violations. If you have questions, please ask. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

More
I have encountered more copyright violations:


 * Your addition to Wikipedia:
 * Source:

Please go through your past contributions and remove any other copy pasting, okay? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Request for explanation
Looking through your contributions, I see you are quite an active member of the community. Could you please explain why you have been copy pasting? Surely you know about policies here. What can you say about all of this? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

More
I have encountered more copyright violations:


 * Your addition to Wikipedia:
 * Source:

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Follow-up
I must say that I am disappointed that you just ignored my request for some sort of explanation and instead just carried on editing. I spent half an hour finding and removing your copy pasting. No "I'm sorry". No "Thanks for cleaning up my blatant copyvios". Nothing. Did you even review your own contribs to see if I missed anything?

I would appreciate at least some some assurance that none of your Reuters-sourced Portal:Current events additions were copy pasted. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi there, Anna. I apologize for the lack of response, I would of done this earlier but I had family things going.


 * As for my copyright violations. Yes, I can see how I definitely should of checked before hand before making those edits. Especially the one on 2016 clown sightings. As you can see by my contribs, I went back and put up the same story, but this time without the violations. As for my edits in general, I believe my copyright violations are only on some particular articles I have created and edited on, such as the ones you highlighted. My edits on Portal:Current events (going back to 2014) are usually quite brief. I've checked through the last couple of months and I haven't seen any obvious copyright violations.


 * I'll try to be more careful in the future. Thanks Anna. GWA88 (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Alright. Are you sure there are no more?


 * Please, from now on, no more copy pasting. You know how seriously Wikipedia takes this sort of thing. It is really breaking the cardinal rule, and you must have known that. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I've now looked through more contribs and I can't see any. I honestly didn't realize I was doing it. I thought you were allowed to copy-paste the odd sentence from a news article. My bad. Again, I'll take this lesson into consideration when I make future edits. GWA88 (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking and thanks for your understanding. Best wishes and happy editing. Oh, and keep up the good work at current events. I know you do a lot there. Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Yemen/Houthis
GWA88. Thanks for the information and for correcting the Portal:Current events/2016 October 14 entry. Fixed Portal:Current events/2016 October 16 using Yemini Crisis. I picked up the insurgency head from the Current Events right sidebar listing, Ongoing conflicts, Middle East, Yemen. The Houthi rebellion link leads to the Houthi insurgency in Yemen page. Perhaps that should be changed. Appreciate all your work and this constructive advice. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 02:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking care of sidebar link.RaqiwasSushi (talk) 03:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

2016-11-19 current events
For the first time the German Wikipedia contains more than two million articles.--Bluemel1 (talk) 18:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Science and technologies

Category:Fifth-generation jet fighters has been nominated for discussion
Category:Fifth-generation jet fighters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 08:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Revert
Can I ask why did you revert my edit on the Current Events box for the Haiti bus crash, it was obviously a double entry - best case would be moving it from disasters to crime, but you simply reverted? Skycycle (talk) 16:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was clearly a case of double entry but you removed the former entry, not the latter made by Capitalistroadster, which included far less details of the incident than the previous entry made by myself. Clearly Capitalistroadster failed to notice it was already included, it happens, I've done it before a few times, and you didn't bother to look at the portal's history to see which one was included first. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2017_March_12&oldid=769962721


 * Apologies if my revert offended you in someway, I just want what's best for the reader. GWA88 (talk) 20:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Rakka (film)
Hi GWA88, I saw you translated my German Wikipedia article about the movie when it was in an early state. I wrote more about the plot. Feel free to translate the new sentences, to add them here. Greetings from Germany. The real Marcoman (talk) 01:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Tires, Portugal
Hi, I'm Boleyn. GWA88, thanks for creating Tires, Portugal!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider adding more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ogba Zoo
Hi, I'm Megalibrarygirl. GWA88, thanks for creating Ogba Zoo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi! This page is a good start, but needs more reliable sources, like this one. Please add more and help improve Wikipedia. :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Coordination of Azawad Movements
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. GWA88, thanks for creating Coordination of Azawad Movements!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 14:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Portals
The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.

Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.

It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.

The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.

A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

Let's do this.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,   &mdash; The Transhumanist   10:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much
The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,  &mdash; The Transhumanist   10:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please ping me. Thank you. -TT

A page you started (Ain Zara) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ain Zara, GWA88!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Do please add some sources to support the factual statements you've made about this town. Thanks."

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 23:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gatwick Airport drone incident


The article Gatwick Airport drone incident has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NOTNEWS"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:09, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Gatwick Airport drone incident
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Renaming Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel to United States recognition of Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel. 2600:1700:BBD0:8050:3C78:A0BB:680D:657F (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Current events
Hello GWA88. It isn't necessary to put every event under a subheader. Normally that is only done when the event is part of a larger event or current issue. There's no need to add subheaders for general topics (for example Animal welfare and rights in Australia). Otherwise, thanks for your continued contributions to the page! Kaldari (talk) 07:36, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Hezbollah
Thanks to you Sir for paying attention to my eedit request, can I further ask that Argentina be included in the infobox as designating the military wing of Hezbollah as terror? Thanks to you Sir, --CoryGlee (talk) 12:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2314 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Current Events.
Hello GWA88. You seem to be a good editor on Portal:Current events, so I wanted to invite you to WikiProject Current events. Elijahandskip (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Elijahandskip. I would be happy to help out where I can. Editing this portal has pretty much become a daily hobby for me anyway. GWA88 (talk) 05:46, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jordan Goudreau
Hello, GWA88,

Thank you for creating Jordan Goudreau.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Adding neutrality tag, events are disputed"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Jamez42 (talk) 00:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Clap for Our Carers
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Copenhagen Marriott Hotel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Copenhagen Marriott Hotel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Copenhagen Marriott Hotel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Alert from WikiProject Current Events
Hello. The WikiProject Current events format is currently being updated. However, one new change is a section for "Current discussions". The Portal:Current events has debates all the time to determine if things are notable for the portal (international news) or if they are better suited for a place like 2020 in the United States. In the past, small 'edit wars' have taken place between editors over topics. This new section on the WikiProject is a new place where editors can discuss between each other and have an easy access to 'outside opinion' from other participates. Members in the Current Event WikiProject are welcome to invite other editors that have disagreements to start the discussion on the WikiProject. (Unlike RFC's, discussions about topics would be about 1 week or whenever the topic is no longer relevant from the WikiProject). Thank you for reading and thank you for participating in the Current Event WikiProject! (Current Event WikiProject Coordinator) Elijahandskip (talk) 19:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 H5N8 outbreak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bird flu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Biden's cabinet
Before entering into a possible avoidable dispute, I will give you my opinion about the latest editions in Current Events and see what we can do. I understand that the importance of the post-Trump cabinet of the United States is recognized and everyone has followed the nominations. But is it really necessary that every confirmation has to be posted? I could come to understand Lloyd Austin's, and even Deb Haaland's, but personally I don't think this is the place to post something that implies that it looks more like a timeline of the early days of the Biden presidency. And the same is my opinion about the Trump edits, but at the time he was not very active. I do not know what is the line that Wikipedia follows in this regard, so if you know I will be happy for you to explain it to me. A greeting. Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Good evening, Alsoriano97. Firstly, I appreciate you leaving this message for me rather than just reverting me for another pointless edit war, so thanks for that. Regarding the confirmations of Biden's cabinet picks, I would say, and this is based on the fact most if not all of Trump's cabinet picks were covered on the portal, and the fact the confirmations often gain international coverage, for example the Lloyd Austin confirmation which you removed, was covered by the The Guardian, it has also been covered by the Financial Times and Al Jazeera. Again, clearly notable. I would of course draw the line at senior cabinet members, lower level administration officials would be definitely pushing it in terms of notability. GWA88 (talk) 22:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Journalists killed in Venezuela


A tag has been placed on Category:Journalists killed in Venezuela requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Utilita Energy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prepayment meter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Mali attacks
We do not know if all the attacks are committed by jihadists so leave the title as it is or open a discussion on this topic. Cerberon-900 (talk) 10:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Twenty-Tens Decade Started
Hey. I know we have crossed paths every now and then on the Portal:Current events, so I wanted to invite you to a new WikiProject, the WikiProject of the Twenty-Tens decade. It was proposed near the end of May, but it was officially created today. Not sure if you would be interested, but I thought I would drop you an invite and say hi. Elijahandskip (talk) 00:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Current events
Dear GWA88, I've started a discussion here. If you have time, please take a look and add your thoughts. Regards, MattSucci  (talk) 11:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

ANI Notice (Alsoriano97)
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Carter00000 (talk) 11:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration Notice
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests/Case and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Carter00000 (talk) 10:11, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Arbitration request declined
An arbitration case to which you were a party has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. The declining arbitrators felt that the request was premature. For the Committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 21:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Notice of AN/I noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

The filing is Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents. Please provide any information on background or specific incidents if you would like to. Carter00000 (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Portal:Current events/2023 April 19
Hello GWA88. I reverted your edit because the satellite might not have crashed in Kyiv at all. It is very unlikely that the green explosion observed over Kyiv was the satellite, and we should probably wait for more reliable reports. More evidence is needed before it can be determined if the satellite fell in Kyiv for sure. — Nythar  (💬-🍀) 22:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, I know your revert was a good faith edit. However, The Guardian is now reporting it is the NASA spacecraft Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI). GWA88 (talk) 22:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * True, The Guardian did report that; however, NASA has now denied that the object over Kyiv was its satellite. BBC News Nythar  (💬-🍀) 02:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I stand corrected. GWA88 (talk) 13:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is GWA88. Thank you. Carter00000 (talk) 11:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi GWA88. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Awesome! I look forward to contributing to help clear the backlog. I'll be sure to read over deletion policy and reviewer talk page. Thanks! GWA88 (talk) 21:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive Editing on Portal:Current Events. Thank you. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi GWA88, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:


 * Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
 * If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
 * If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)