User talk:GXIndiana

Hi there: Just wanted to let you know that I think I grasped what you were trying to do with the Harlow Hickenlooper page -- I turned it into a "redirect", which will take people to the page for Hal Fryar. We don't usually have information on two separate pages about the same person. I hope you are okay with this; you can leave me a note if you have any questions or problems. Welcome aboard, and thanks for your contribution! Accounting4Taste: talk 22:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Parispipple12.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Parispipple12.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Parispipple12.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parispipple12.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 15:46, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Fred L. Paris/Comments


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Best regards,  Cind.   amuse  (Cindy) 17:24, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 01:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Heavy Metal Parking Lot movie poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Heavy Metal Parking Lot movie poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Paul Oquist Kelley


Hello, GXIndiana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paul Oquist Kelley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

You are invited to discuss why you violated the single revert rule on Council on American–Islamic Relations
You are past 1RR at Council on American–Islamic Relations, a page where only one reversion is allowed by any single editor in any 24 hour period. I have not blocked you. I have instead fully protected the page temporarily. If you choose not to discuss the subject at Talk:Council on American–Islamic Relations, I will partially block you (from editing the CAIR page) until you explain yourself and discuss a solution on talk. BusterD (talk) 02:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I reverted it one time. Furthermore, that page has been vandalized with misinformation and slander. It needs to be corrected immediately. I invited the other person to improve it instead of simply reverting it back to that poor state. Isn't that what we do here?GXIndiana (talk) 23:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * As an environmental professional, I only operate on the basis of facts. If I understand the policy on "original research" correctly, that does not apply to the ACLU material. It is self published but obviously they're an organization of attorneys, first of all, and they have superior editorial oversight. These are not people on the History Channel talking about their book on aliens. Badabara or whoever raised that is not clear on the concept.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Referencing_for_beginners
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_301
 * hings like SCOTUSBlop, or the Southern Poverty Law Center, or the American Civil Liberties Union when they post items to their websites, while the groups are "self publishing", we do not consider these SPSs, there is that factor that there is editorial oversight and control that prevent raw thoughts from going from pen to publication without any check, and that's basically what's the distinguishing factor here. But basically, the SPS is more gears to individual blogs more than anything else. --Masem (t) 13:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC) GXIndiana (talk) 23:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * FINALLY, review my improvements to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihad_Awad
 * Cleaned up real nice, IMHO. I thoroughly researched his statements about Oct. 7 and used the fullest quote I could find. There'd be a link to the actual speech at the AMP convention but apparently they took it off their website under pressure. GXIndiana (talk) 00:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * That's all very well and good, but we discuss the topic on the relevant topic talk page, so that you and others may actually discuss together, instead of here by yourself. My notice above was about your bad behavior, not specific content. BusterD (talk) 00:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I overlooked that instruction, sorry. GXIndiana (talk) 23:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)