User talk:G PViB

November 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of Russian weaponry has been reverted. Your edit here to List of Russian weaponry was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yElDDfaQXO8) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Pobedit
As you are on WikiProject Russia/Technology and engineering in Russia task force and I am not sure how to notify the project about this, would you please inform the project if necessary? If I should do something else, would you please leave a message on my talk page?

I have proposed that Pobedit merge to cemented carbide see talk:Pobedit. Also, pobedit which is cemented tungsten carbide (WC) is comparable in hardness to corundum. Diamond is commonly used to machine both WC and corundum. I believe that the absolute hardnesss of WC is less than 25% of diamond. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:47, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

AK-103
Militaary factory is a reliable website & you are preventing this page to get developed .. Wiki policy states only forums, social networks, sites on spam list & blogs not be used as references. Military factory is reliable just like global fir power, weapons systems, ... ... Hope you wont do that again (Theoccupiedkashmir (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC))
 * Nope, that's not what the policy says. It states those are some examples of sites not to be used. As noted, Militaryfactory appears to use Wikipedia as a source, and Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Also, note to G PViB, be careful of WP:3RR on the AK-103 article, please. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at AK-103. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Nick-D (talk) 10:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blocked you as you have been edit warring over this article while not making any attempt to discuss the matter. Nick-D (talk) 10:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

World War II
Off-topic? ,, , , as if the Soviet victims were somehow not as important. Tobby72 (talk) 09:20, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * All I can say is that the majority of most vocal proponents of nazism are genetic garbage. G_PViB (talk) 16:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Russian Navy
Hello, I reverted your edits at Russian Navy because the content you restored does not comply with Verifiability as the citation provided is a blog WP:BLOGS. Please provide more authoritative sources if you with the material to remain in the article.Antiochus the Great (talk) 20:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Your recent editing history at AC transformer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Anti-reflective coating shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)