User talk:Gabbyblandino/sandbox

Rebeca's Peer Review
What I like about your edits is how you go into details regarding what each source offers. It’s also nice how you bullet point at the end of the summary any statistical data that the sources may offer. It’s also useful that you provided links to all of your sources, so that anybody can look at the sources you mention. Another factor that I enjoyed from your edits is that you provide questions to guide your edits for the articles you’ve chosen. In addition, under the health literacy and article review you give definitions for phrases that are used in the article, meaning that you expand on the article and give your opinion of what is lacking. The only criticism that I have, it that it’s not clear what you plan to add to the articles, I only have a general sense of what you plan to add or change. It would be nice if you were to add a section on what you plan to change or add.

Urania's Peer Review
I really like how you have your Sandbox laid out! I especially like how you linked the actual Wikipedia articles you are working on, it makes going back and forth to those pages much easier and faster. It's really cool to see your thought process working through what you want to add to your articles based on the questions you added to both your Sector and Area sections and how you cited sources as you went along. For your Scholarly Sources section, I really like how you summarized what each source was about and added what you would like to add each article when you start drafting, it will make the writing process a whole lot faster. I also really liked how you pulled out direct numerical figures from those articles that I assume you will be highlighting when you begin drafting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uargueta (talk • contribs) 18:53, 1 November 2018 (UTC)