User talk:Gabbym9903/Seville

This is a recreation of Gabbym9903's original, which can be seen in the Revision history of her sandbox's talk page: User_talk:Gabbym9903/sandbox

=Evaluations=

4/23/2019 Evaluation by Afackrell
Afackrell (talk) 07:32, 23 April 2019 (EST)
 * Points: 42/40
 * Grade: 93%

Spelling/Grammar
Exceeds Standard Perfect spelling and grammar.

Language
Nearly Meets Standard Occasional contraction, informal language. The “main sights” ending could be improved to be more formal.

Organization
Exceeds Standard Perfect paragraphs and headers.

Coding
Exceeds Standard Perfect code

Validity
Nearly Meets Standard Information looks accurately accredited but some claims should not be made as they can’t be proven. “So there is something for everyone” and some other opinion like statements such as “Seville is a big tourist center” could be improved. This would also help with the language portion and make it more similar to an encyclopedia.

Completion
Exceeds Standard Good information added and very balanced in terms of the festivals amount of information.

Relevance
Exceeds Standard No irrelevant content.

5/7/2019 Evaluation by DrMichaelWright
DrMichaelWright (talk) 05:24, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Points: 38/40
 * Grade: 95%

Spelling/Grammar
Meets standard.

Language
Nearly meets standard.
 * I see that in the live version, that one paragraph ends in "...so there is something for everyone," which in your submitted draft ends in "...which contribute to the high level of tourism." I really like that latter version a great deal more. It sounds less like a tourist pamphlet and more like an encyclopedia.
 * "...a huge celebration..." reads a bit too informal.
 * "...about two weeks after the Holy Week." Is it possible to be more specific? What determines the date?

Organization
Meets standard.

Coding
Meets standard.
 * It's awesome that you're using the DOI code, and I can see that you tried to get some good code in there. However, in order to properly code it for references it needs to be coded as  10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.033 , rather than the way that you have it as  doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.033.  (For future reference)

Validity
Meets standard.

Completion
Meets standard.

Relevance
Meets standard.