User talk:Gabiholzwarth

January 2016
Hello, I'm DatGuy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Travis Kalanick with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dat GuyTalkContribs 20:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Travis Kalanick. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Travis Kalanick was changed by Gabiholzwarth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854483 on 2016-01-07T21:00:04+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Travis Kalanick with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 21:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Learn how to constructively edit here in under an hour!
 The Adventure

Why you are being reverted
Hello Gabiholzwarth. Please, stop removing sourced content from Travis Kalanick. On Wikipedia, content must be sourced to reliable, independent sources that are verifiable. This means that, unfortunately, we cannot just take your word for it. We have to go off of what secondary sources have written. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 21:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)