User talk:Gabriel3helsing

Hello ;).....

Speedy deletion nomination of Www.nikhilgoswami.com


A tag has been placed on Www.nikhilgoswami.com, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 21:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gabriel3helsing/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Gabriel3helsing/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  22:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

About your new article
I've tagged your new article for speedy deletion under four criteria:
 * A3: No content. Your article just consists of a link to one of your posts in Facebook.
 * A7: Non-notable website. When I visit your website, it gives a 404-like page that says the site will come soon. For me, this seems like the website equivalent of vaporware (software that is announced to appear but actually never appears).
 * A11: Obviously made-up: Your website was clearly made up one day. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and encyclopedias are not for things made up one day.
 * G11: Spam: Your article is promoting your website.

A few minutes later, your article got deleted, per criterion A3.

Creating an article about your website causes a conflict of interest and is strongly discouraged. Only do this if several independent reliable secondary sources have discussed your website beyond its trivial mention. After you've found sources, send me a message in my talk page saying you have the sources, after editing the article to include the sources. Then I'll review your article, fix cite errors, typos and other things. Wikipedia is not a battleground. Wikipedia is not about winning. If someone reverts your edit, do not revert back. This is edit warring, a form of disruptive editing. Two notable exceptions to this rule are if you're reverting vandalism or reverting your own edits. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 22:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)