User talk:Gabriel A. Álvarez N./Archive 1

Welcome!
Hi Gabriel Ziegler! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Map detail
Please make sure that the maps you add are more detailed than the ones they replace and make sense for the articles they are located in. Uyghurs overwhelmingly live in Xinjiang so it makes sense for a map of the Uyghur language to have a focus on Xinjiang. Listing every city outside of China with only a minute Uyghur (Tokyo?) population while making Xinjiang hard to spot on the map does not make any sense. The Dutch colonial empire map you made is also less detailed than the ones it replaced, at least when it comes to different types of colonial holdings, when they were colonized, and missing the color legend. A mono-color map with no differentiation between holdings is not superior. Qiushufang (talk) 17:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I understand your point, i thought only to select japan as a country where there's people that speak Uyghur, but i selected Tokyo because is the largest city by population and there's no information where Uyghur-speakers are in Japan, i would like you to explain why does not make sense. The Dutch Colonial Map is less detailed, i can recognize your argument, but i made it to be more simple, and some of my "Colonials Empires" maps are detailed in many details. I couldn't find all the colonies of the Dutch Empire (Most of them Trading Post) and only added the colonies i could find, if you can give me the sources of all those trading post and colonies, i would love to read and remake my map. Also the Legend "Mono-color map" of the actual map dad you replaced of mine, i really found it needless because Dutch East India Company is obviously a part of the Dutch Empire and as i said, i wanted to make the map more simple for the people, also the Dutch East India Company has an own page. Also i putted the hard spot because of Urumqi, Yanqui Hui Autonomous County... Etc, by many sources Urumqi and the another zones has a great majority of Uyghur-speakers. I won't change the map of the Uyghur language because i see your discomfort with the map, and i would like to remake it for a future. But i will undo your changes in the Dutch stuff because the map i made have all the colonies/trading post that has page on Wikipedia and another sources of Internet, Is more simple and more understandable, more quality that can show where exactly were positioned the colony/tranding post, is needless to add that the colonies of South Africa, India, Indonesia, etc... Were controlled by Dutch East India Company, because the Dutch East India Company has already an own page on Wikipedia. Thanks for your message. Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Finland, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi !!! Thank you for telling me that, i hope i fixed it with the citation you were talking about ! Thanks. Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 19:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, thank you for adding the citation, it looks like you accidentally removed the short description though, but it's fine I restored it. TylerBurden (talk) 19:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Gabriel Ziegler, I'm Dreamy Jazz. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Guidance for younger editors and On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 13:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you ! Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 02:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Unsourced additions
Hi Gabriel, just wanted to let you know that I undid your addition of unsourced material at French colonial empire. If you can find a reliable source that supports this, please re-add your content, along with a citation to the source. See Help:Footnotes for how to do this. I noticed your change at Ünal Üstel as well, and would have undid that as well, but someone had already done so. You added a citation in that case (thank you for that!) but it was to a Facebook post, which is not permitted, because it is a self-published source and considered unreliable. Please read WP:Identifying reliable sources for more about this.

I see that quite a few of your contributions were reverted, and that you have been frequently making content additions and changes without providing a source. You are still very new here, and it's easier to establish good editing habits when you are new. So please get in the habit of always adding a citation to a reliable source that supports the content you are adding. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my Talk page, or you can ask any questions about editing Wikipedia at the Help desk. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 07:12, 22 September 2022 (UTC)


 * How can i prove that France never controlled Guinea-Bissau? Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 13:44, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I've undone your edit at French colonial empire again, because you (again) did not provide any citations. Please do not revert again without doing so. As a new editor, it's *very important* that you understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, of which WP:Verifiability and neutral point of view are two of the most important. If you still don't understand, you can ask me below or on my Talk page, or if you want an independent assessment, please go to Help desk and ask your question there. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I saw your message of 03:59, 23 September on my Talk page. I'll get back to you in a day or two about your questions. However, two things about where and how your messages are placed:
 * That was the third message you've written on my Talk page about one topic, but instead of threading the discussion properly, you've created three separate sections on my Talk page, one section for each comment. Please don't do that. When replying or adding new comments about a single topic, keep them in the same section. Please read WP:THREAD about how to reply to discussions on Talk pages.
 * Secondly: as the message at the top of my Talk page indicates, I prefer to keep discussions in one place, not fragmented between your page and mine. I'll move all of your comments from my page over here in a day or two, and then we can keep all the comments in one place, and continue discussing here, and where you'll be able to easily find it again, and refer to it when you wish to.
 * If you want to reply to this message before I get back to you about your other questions, please do so on *this* page, and please read WP:THREAD before replying. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 04:13, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry for that and i won't do it again. Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 04:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Erik Oxenstierna moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Erik Oxenstierna, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Ihnat Dwarczanin moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ihnat Dwarczanin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Waddles 🗩 🖉 17:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Klein-Venedig into History of Germany. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

East Inner Mongolian Autonomous Government moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, East Inner Mongolian Autonomous Government, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Das Schulgespenst moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Das Schulgespenst, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Linking more than once or twice in an article is bad style
If we link the subject many times in an article, the link becomes less visible/noticeable and therefore less useful to readers. BusterD (talk) 01:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I do not think by that way but still thank you. Feeling I won't touch that page again. Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 01:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No big deal, and welcome to Wikipedia. If I can be of help in any way, please call on me. I'm certain User:Nick-D feels the same way. Some new users have difficulty with the behavioral learning curve. And most wikipedians are pretty bold. BusterD (talk) 02:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:OVERLINK for advice on this topic. Nick-D (talk) 03:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Prussia
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Prussia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed.  Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential.  While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached (see WP:STATUSQUO).


 * To help move things along, I have started a discussion on the article talk page about the disputed edit, which you will find here. Please take the opportunity to make your views known there.  It is best not to restore the material you added until there is a consensus among the editors there to do so. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Relax, Edit War? Well i know what it is but, for 2 reverts? Well ok, I guess you're like that. Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Still don't understand why is this a Edit war. We just disagreed and that's it, We never broken the three-revert rule. Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 05:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Ernst Graf von Isenburg
Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your first edit summary (e.g. “translated from de.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 06:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

The article Embassy of Germany, Ankara has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NBUILDING, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. This is best included in Germany–Turkey relations."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 02:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi ! I understand, i think is about the map of the building, when i created the page, i added wrong coordinates and i delete the map, i do not know how the map is there... You should check the history of the page, because i just putted wrong coordinates and i delete them. Thank you ! Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 19:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Das Schulgespenst (October 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Das Schulgespenst and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Das_Schulgespenst Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Das_Schulgespenst reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 05:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Your edit to List of sovereign states and dependent territories in Eurasia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. 25stargeneral (talk) 00:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi
Moved within that talk page:

Talk:2022_missile_explosion_in_Poland. 89.8.70.65 (talk) 23:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Nice improvement, Gabriel_Ziegler. Thanks. 89.8.70.65 (talk) 23:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spanish immigration to Venezuela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miranda. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

HRE 1648
Can you re-check your claim on loss of Italy in 1648. I did a Google image search for HRE maps in 1648 and they all show Italy as being separate at this point, one example. E-960 (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The map may be wrong, There are several counties that the map shows to be a single "nation". Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 20:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Municipalities of Venezuela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Rosalía.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Erik Oxenstierna
Hello, Gabriel Ziegler. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erik Oxenstierna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ihnat Dwarczanin
Hello, Gabriel Ziegler. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ihnat Dwarczanin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Erik Oxenstierna


Hello, Gabriel Ziegler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Erik Oxenstierna".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:58, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Why revert edit from 9 days ago?
Many edits were already made, why revert? Old photo seems better. Jishiboka1 (talk) 01:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ihnat Dwarczanin


Hello, Gabriel Ziegler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ihnat Dwarczanin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Das Schulgespenst
Hello, Gabriel Ziegler. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Das Schulgespenst, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Minor edits
Hi Gabriel, I've noticed that you've been marking your contributions as "minor edits," but though most of them are definitely not minor. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information; the page also contains examples of what are and are not minor edits. Tserton (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you !!! Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi again – I saw that you've continued to mark most of your contributions as minor edits. Please stop doing this. It might seem like a small thing, but the minor edit tag exists for a reason. From Help:Minor edit: Because editors may choose to ignore minor edits when reviewing recent changes, the distinction between major and minor edits is significant. Logged-in users can set their preferences not to display minor edits. The only things you should be marking as 'minor edits' are changes to the layout, correcting typos and reverting vandalism. Almost all of your contributions to date are not minor edits. --Tserton (talk) 09:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Das Schulgespenst


Hello, Gabriel Ziegler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Das Schulgespenst".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 05:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:East Inner Mongolian Autonomous Government
Hello, Gabriel Ziegler. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:East Inner Mongolian Autonomous Government, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)