User talk:Gabriel Easteron

Welcome!

Hello, Gabriel Easteron, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 05:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

User:Vandal Blocker
Greetings! Is there a reason you've created User:Vandal Blocker and User talk:Vandal Blocker? I ask particularly because there is no underlying account. —C.Fred (talk) 05:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * In the absence of an explanation I have deleted them under criterion for speedy deletion U2, user pages for a non-existent user. —C.Fred (talk) 05:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tamplate:Banned


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  18:57, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Attempting to assume good faith
I am puzzled why you removed the notice indicating that a source was needed before dividing the list into seasons and yet you divided the list into seasons without providing any such source? []. It is hard to assume good faith in such a situation, but I suppose that you can provide a reason for your actions other than simply being disruptive?Active Banana    (bananaphone  17:24, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * And what exactly is your basis for the claim "its supposed to have seasons"? I do not see any such distinction made anywhere. "Just because I think everything is presented in seasons" is not an appropriate reason. Active Banana    (bananaphone  18:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Froggy Apple Crumble Thumpkin


A tag has been placed on The Froggy Apple Crumble Thumpkin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 23:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Spongebob Fake Wiki


A tag has been placed on Spongebob Fake Wiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Cind. amuse  19:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for creating inappropriate pages. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 19:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GEELY MK


A tag has been placed on GEELY MK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Teapot  george Talk  21:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * There is not enough to say about the Geely MK to warrant an article of its own. Accordingly, I've turned the page you created into a redirect to the manufacturing company, Zhejiang Geely Holding Group. —C.Fred (talk) 21:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)