User talk:Gabrielaperez544/Aseismic creep

Gabriela's Peer Review
Lead Section: The lead section is well written and concise. It gives a good description of what aseismic creep is, as well as what branch of science it is related to. The lead section relates to the rest of the article and hints at the importance of measurements taken of these faults for predicting future earthquakes. It does not give any part of the article too much weight. I don't feel that anything is missing from this lead section nor do I see any redundancies.

Structure: The article is neatly organized into three different sections with subtitle headings that tell the reader what they will be reading about. They are organized in a sensible manner that essentially leads the reader from cause to effect. It is easy to understand the different topic that each section of the article covers.

Balanced Coverage: The coverage of this article is balanced and gives more description to the scientific causes and measurements before moving on to describing examples of the phenomenon itself. Everything in the article is on topic and relatable to seismic creep. The article makes no attempt to try and make readers draw conclusions from what is being said; it simply describes aseismic creep.

Neutrality: The article does not attempt to persuade the reader to take any point of view. The only change I would suggest is using "Examining" instead of "Knowing" in the first paragraph of the measurements section. The article makes no claims for any group or person. The article does not try to spin aseismic creep in a positive or negative manner.

Sources: I would recommend citing the website(s) or other sources that you used to find the information in the example section. Otherwise, the article draws equally from two different reliable sources. Most sections in the article are supported adequately with citations.

Improvements: I liked the fact that you included an example section of where aseismic creep takes place; I could apply that to my own article. I feel that it would be most beneficial to add to the Causes and Measurements section of the article if possible. I think that adding another citation to the 2nd part of the measurements paragraph could also be beneficial. The Causes section does a great job at explaining why aseismic creep occurs, great job.

Fgraba (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)